Supreme Court Internship 2025 at Justice Vikram Nath`s office

โšช๏ธ Early data ยท 0
Too early to tell 0 reports
โš–๏ธ Know if this firm actually replies before applying

The Supreme Court Internship 2025 at Justice Vikram Nath`s office presents an unparalleled opportunity for final-year law students and fresh law graduates to experience legal practice at the highest level โ€” the Supreme Court of India. The office of Honโ€™ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath is currently accepting internship applications from current students who are studying law, 3 year and 5 year, and the internship is open on a rolling basis for the months of September (1stโ€“26th), October (5thโ€“31st), November, and December (1stโ€“21st) 2025.

Who Can Apply for the internship?

The Supreme Court Internship 2025 at Justice Vikram Nath`s office is only open strictly to:

  • Final-year students of a 5-Year Law Course (i.e., 5th year),
  • Final-year students of a 3-Year Law Course (i.e., 3rd year), and
  • Fresh law graduates (those who have recently completed their LLB).

Applicants of the internship must ensure that they meet this eligibility criteria. Applications from students in earlier years will not be considered.

Deadline and Duration

The internship works on a rolling application basis, but you must apply before the 15th of the preceding month of your desired internship. That means:

  • To apply for September 2025, submit before August 15, 2025.
  • For October 2025, apply before September 15, 2025.
  • And so on.

Internship duration ranges between 2โ€“4 weeks, depending on the month and the schedule of the court.

Why Apply for the Supreme Court Internship 2025 at Justice Vikram Nath`s office?

Interning at the office of a sitting judge of the Supreme Court of India is a rare and prestigious experience. Here’s what makes this opportunity stand out:

  • Hands-on Exposure to constitutional litigation, procedural law, and judicial interpretation.
  • Direct mentorship from clerks, researchers, and legal associates at the apex court.
  • Drafting and Research tasks that strengthen your legal writing and analytical skills.
  • Courtroom Observation to witness the working of the highest judiciary first-hand.
  • Enhances your CV and credibility for future academic or litigation opportunities.

How to Apply

To apply for the Justice Vikram Nath Internship 2025, follow these steps:

  1. Fill out the official internship form here: Application Form Link
  2. Submit the form before the 15th of the month prior to the internship.
  3. Ensure your application is well-formatted, error-free, and contains:
    • Updated CV (1โ€“2 pages),
    • Statement of Purpose (max 300 words),
    • Contact details and educational background.

Any incomplete or ineligible applications will be automatically rejected.

For Queries

All internship-related queries must be sent via email to:
internship.vnj@gmail.com

Note: Do not contact chambers via phone or LinkedIn unless asked to do so.

Pro Tips to Get Selected

To increase your chances of being shortlisted:

  • Tailor your SOP to show your understanding of constitutional law and judicial reasoning.
  • Highlight any research papers, moots, internships, or publications relevant to constitutional or appellate practice.
  • Maintain a formal tone and ensure clarity in your writing.

About Justice Vikram Nath

Honโ€™ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath is a respected Judge of the Supreme Court of India, known for his balanced jurisprudence and clarity in judgment. Before elevation to the apex court, he served as the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court and Judge of the Allahabad High Court. Interning under his guidance offers invaluable insight into constitutional adjudication and judicial ethics.

In Summary

If you’re a serious final-year law student or a fresh law graduate looking to understand the real workings of the Indian Supreme Court, the Justice Vikram Nath Internship 2025 is an opportunity you shouldn’t miss. It can shape your legal thinking, improve your research skills, and open doors to future roles in litigation, academia, or judicial clerkships.

Apply soon โ€” the seats fill up fast, and the deadline is strict!

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Coal India Ltd., competent to fix coal prices for the non-core sector: Coal India Ltd vs M/S Rahul Industries . And Ors

In the matter of Coal Ltd vs M/S Rahul Industries and Ors.. the Supreme Court on 12 September 2025 upheld the validity of the Interim Coal Policy notified on 15 December 2006, holding that Coal India Ltd., a public sector undertaking, was competent to fix coal prices for the non-core sector under the deregulated framework of the Colliery Control Order, 2000.

A bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan dealt with the issue of smokeless fuel against a 20% price hike introduced under the Interim Coal Policy, the same being linked to non-core sectors against consumers in the core sector. The Court clarified that Ashoka Smokeless judgement struck down the e-auction system for lacking a viable pricing mechanism but did not reinstate prior price levels or prohibit interim pricing.

The issues lying before the Court comprised of firstly, whether Coal India Limited (CIL) had the legal authority to notify interim coal prices following the Supreme Courtโ€™s decision in Ashoka Smokeless. Secondly, whether the 20% price increase imposed on the non-core sector consumers was arbitrary, discriminatory, and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, particularly considering the differential treatment between core and non-core sectors. Thirdly, the question was whether the respondents were entitled to claim refunds for the alleged excess amount paid during the period when the Interim Coal Policy was in effect.

The Court found that from the above legal exposition, it is clear that if there is a concern that the party claiming a refund may have shifted the financial burden or loss to a third party, then a refund should not be allowed. In such situations, the State bears the responsibility to retain those funds and apply them for the benefit of the public, acting in its capacity as parens patriae (guardian of the public interest). The argument of the same being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution was rejected. 

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM โ€“ 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM โ€“ 9 PM (Mon-Sat)