The Roots and Rise of Alternate Dispute Resolution: A Historical Overview


Introduction:

The rise of Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanism in resolving legal disputes is changing the legal landscape expeditiously, but have you ever thought about how the concept of Alternate Dispute Resolution emerged as a tool to resolving disputes in the legal sphere? From where does the idea emanate and how it got its present shape? Does it have a history of evolution? The answers is- Yes! Just like every other thing in this world, the Alternate Dispute Resolution system also has its own history and that too an interesting one. The present article discusses the historical journey of the same and traces its entire development, right from the earliest phase.

The History of Arbitration in India:

The history of arbitration in India dates back to the Vedic period. The information about the presence of such mechanism in ancient India is derived from the ancient texts such as the Vedas, the Smritis, sutras, the Dharmashastra and other epics. These texts provide an exhaustive account of the dispute resolution mechanism which prevailed in ancient India. For instance, Smritis provide us insights about the presence of three types of courts i.e. The Puga (a group of persons residing in the same locality but belonging to different tribes), the Kula (a body consisting of people from same caste groups) and the Srenis (consisting of Artisans and traders).

The Ancient India-

The Vedic Period- (1500 BC- 1000 BC)
The earliest Veda- The Rigveda enunciates the existence of three village assemblies for resolving disputes i.e. the Sabhas, the Samitis and the Vidhatas. These assemblies solved various disputes at the village level and looked after civil, military, family and religious affairs with a mediator known as the Madhyamasi. So, the disputes were resolved in these assemblies. People mostly prefer resolving disputes with the four walls of their house, this used to be a practice in the ancient times as well, thus this mechanism prevailed even in the past.

The Later Vedic Period- (1000 BC- 600 BC)
This period saw the emergence of the other three Vedas i.e. the Samaveda, the Yajurveda and the Atharvaveda. This period saw the importance of Kings in the administration of justice and sometimes special officers were also employed by him, known as the Assessors. Sometimes a chief justice was also involved who was known as Adhyaksha. The system was so efficiently organized that there even existed town councils and village panchayats. Officials such as Sabhapati, Gramyavadin, Athapati, etc also existed. Cases ranged from petty cases to serious ones and were resolved at different levels.

Other Developments-
Later on, the advancement of Hindu jurisprudence also took place by drawing insights from the Dharmasutras, Manusmriti etc. The period is also known as the era of Dharmashastra. Apart from the king’s court, Panchayats and Parishads were also involved in solving cases, which more or less worked upon the patterns of present day Alternate Dispute Resolution. The Brhadaranayaka Upanishad also mentions about arbitration in India.

The Medieval India-

The medieval period saw the unfolding of Mughal rule in India. Along with the advancement in other sectors, the rulers also took steps for efficient administration of justice. Several specialized officials such as the Qazi, were appointed in various parts of the territory (also known as the Qazi-ul-Quzzat). Officers such as Fauzdar and Kotwal were distinct officers who were dedicated at deciding criminal cases and were also responsible for maintaining law and order in the territory. Hakam was a specially appointed arbitrator in the territory. Not only the Mughals but even the other dynasties had dedicated legal officials for the purpose of administration of justice. E.g Nyayadhish, Mamlatdar etc.

The Modern India-

As the time passed and world became modern, complexities also increased, which gave rise to more conflicts and disputes. Though the judiciary had modernized and had become much efficient and organized as compared to the ancient and the medieval period, the system could not keep with the increasing number of cases and their disposal within a reasonable time. More over people (by their very nature) are reluctant to come to the court due to many reasons, the time factor being an important consideration. So, a need for such a mechanism was felt where cases could be disposed in time without the hustle of reaching the courts. This gave rise to the present day Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanism, with out of court settlement and speedy disposal cases being its two significant advantages.

The first arbitration law in India (after Arbitration was recognized as a dispute resolution mechanism) was the Arbitration Act of 1899, which had its application in the three presidency towns of Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. Before this, there was another act known as the Bengal Regulation of 1772 and as its extension, the Bombay Regulation Act of 1799 and Madras Regulation Act of 1802 were also passed. But still a need was felt to enact a uniform law which throughout the country which was known as the Arbitration Act of 1940. The arbitral award was granted after being scrutinized by the civil courts. The most recent legislation that we have today is the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Several new and related legislations have also come in to meet the requirements of the current times.

Conclusion-

Thus, the evolution of ADR in India took place and today it has become a most preferred choice for people to resolve their legal disputes smartly, practically, efficiently and timely. Gradually, it has become an indispensable tool to resolve disputes in today’s world.

References-

• Manjula SR, ‘History and Development of Law of Arbitration in India’
(ResearchGate, 2022)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361501647_HISTORY_AND_DEVELOPMENT_OF_LAW_OF_ARBITRATION_IN_INDIA accessed 29 December 2024.

• Khurana & Khurana Article:
Khurana & Khurana IP Law Firm, ‘Evolution of Alternate Dispute Resolution – Indian Perspective’ (Khurana & Khurana, 27 February 2024)
https://www.khuranaandkhurana.com/2024/02/27/evolution-of-alternate-dispute-resolution-indian-perspective/ accessed 5 June 2025.

• Rashi Jain and Mahima Bhardwaj, ‘Evolution of Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: Laws and Practices’ (2024) 14(1) International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE)
https://www.int-jecse.net/article/EVOLUTION+OF+ALTERNATIVE+DISPUTE+RESOLUTION+IN+INDIA%253A+LAWS+AND+PRACTICES_3690/?download=true&format=pdf accessed 5 June 2025.

• Ministry of Law and Justice, Alternate Dispute Resolution in India (Department of Legal Affairs, Government of India)
https://legalaffairs.gov.in/sites/default/files/Arbitration_Mediation.pdf accessed 24 September 2024.

• Government Report – Ministry of Law and Justice (PDF):
Ministry of Law and Justice, Arbitration and Mediation: A Way Forward
(Government of India, 2021)
https://legalaffairs.gov.in/sites/default/files/Arbitration_Mediation.pdf accessed 5 June 2025

Short Bio –
Khushi Pawar is a third-year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) student at SVKM’s NMIMS, Indore. She takes a keen interest in socio-legal issues, especially those related to environmental justice, legal aid, and public policy. With a growing passion for research and writing, she hopes to contribute to meaningful conversations that bring law closer to the needs of people.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

The Udaipur Files Controversy Case

The Udaipur Files controversy case (Jani Firefox Media Pvt. Ltd v. Maulana Arshad Madani and Ors.) has been listed for awaiting the Centre’s decision on a review petition filed against granting it certification. The president of  Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Maulana Arshad Madani filed the matter alleging a skewed and biased representation of muslim identity. The hearing of the case is deferred for July 21 2025 before the bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi

The movie is inspired from the Kanhaiya Lal 2022 murder case. The trailer received flak initially due to its showcasing a set of controversial statements by BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma. The director and producer are notably supportive of Sanatani ideology. 

The defendants have alleged that the producer Amit Jani has been receiving death threats, particularly for the choice in casting Seema Haider in the film. Seema Haider received popularity when she tried to illegally enter India from Pakistan on the pretext of marrying a man she had met on PUBG. The Court has granted the defendants the scope to approach local police for availing of protection. 

In 2022, a tailor named Kanhaiya Lal was brutally beheaded allegedly by Muhammad Riyaz Attari and Muhammad Ghaus. The video was posted online. The trial is as of now pending before the Court. Mohammed Javed as one of the petitioners too has been permitted to participate in the proceedings by the Court. He had been indicted in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case but granted bail by the Rajasthan High Court. 

While Courts have usually favoured preserving the creative and artistic intent of makers, they have also balanced ethical and societal considerations on the side. The row over Tandav web series bordered on allegations of hurting religious sentiments. The controversy initiated striking changes on regulation of OTT platforms in India and on the liability of intermediaries. Since then, the government has notified the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (the “Intermediary Rules, 2021”).

The 1989 case of S. Rangarajan v. P. Jagjivan Ram concerning the Tamil film Ore Oru Gramathile had laid down the foundational affirmation in context of film censorship. It recognized freedom of expressing artistic intent through the visual medium as a constituent of Article 19. Reasonable restrictions still apply but do not encroach onto the liberty of criticizing the government’s actions and political issues in open space. 

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)