Law Drishti Logo
Law Drishti Logo
Contact
Submit Posts

Litigation Interns Hiring | Advocate Sonam Pandey, Arth Legal, Navi Mumbai

Ongoing

Legal & Litigation Internships in Mumbai/Navi Mumbai | High Court & Law Firm Opportunities

Are you a law student looking to gain hands-on legal experience in a professional setting? Top law firms and advocates in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai are currently hiring legal and litigation interns for full-time, on-site internships. These opportunities provide practical exposure to civil and criminal appellate litigation, arbitration, corporate disputes, and high court practice, helping you build a strong foundation for your legal career.

Internship Opportunities

1. Litigation Intern – Advocate Sonam Pandey, Arth Legal (Vashi, Navi Mumbai)

  • Duration: Minimum 6 months (long-term preferred)
  • Practice Areas: Civil & criminal appellate matters, arbitration, corporate disputes, writ petitions
  • Eligibility: Law students in 3rd year or above (5-year course) or 2nd year or above (3-year course)
  • Responsibilities: Conduct legal research, draft petitions and affidavits, attend court hearings, assist in case preparation and client support
  • Stipend: Performance-based
  • Apply: Send CV & cover letter to arthlegalservices@gmail.com

2. Legal Intern – Phoenix Law Chambers (Dwarka, Delhi, option to mention if remotely accessible for Mumbai candidates)

  • Duration: Full-time, on-site
  • Eligibility: Enrolled in or completed a law degree program
  • Responsibilities: Legal research, drafting documents, assisting in client communications, case preparation, ensuring compliance
  • Apply: Send CV to aditya2407rana@gmail.com

3. Other Opportunities in Mumbai (Sample for SEO purposes)

Many Mumbai law firms and chambers also offer internships in areas such as:

  • Civil litigation & criminal law
  • Corporate law & arbitration
  • Writ petitions & appellate matters
  • Legal research & advisory services

Why Pursue a Legal or Litigation Internship?

Interning with established advocates and law firms offers several professional advantages:

  1. Hands-On Experience: Work directly on real cases, court proceedings, and client advisory.
  2. Skill Development: Sharpen research, drafting, communication, and case management skills.
  3. Exposure to Courts: Attend hearings in high courts and tribunals to understand courtroom procedures.
  4. Networking: Connect with legal professionals, senior advocates, and peers.
  5. Mentorship: Learn directly from experienced practitioners and gain guidance for your legal career.
  6. Career Advancement: Strong internship experience enhances your CV for future employment or higher studies.

Eligibility for Legal & Litigation Interns

Candidates typically must:

  • Be enrolled in or have completed a law degree program (LLB, BA LLB, or equivalent)
  • Possess strong legal research and drafting abilities
  • Be punctual, professional, and dedicated
  • Be willing to attend court hearings regularly (for litigation internships)
  • Have prior internship experience (preferred but not mandatory)

Key Responsibilities for Interns

Depending on the firm or advocate, interns may be tasked with:

  • Conducting in-depth legal research on case law, statutes, and regulations
  • Drafting petitions, legal notices, affidavits, and other court documents
  • Organizing case files, exhibits, and evidence
  • Supporting attorneys during client meetings, arbitration sessions, and hearings
  • Assisting in strategy development for cases under supervision

These responsibilities equip interns with practical skills that cannot be learned in the classroom alone.

Benefits of Joining Top Legal Internships

  • Practical Learning: Understand litigation and corporate law in real-time
  • Professional Growth: Learn from experienced advocates and attorneys
  • Enhanced CV: Gain credibility and demonstrate your commitment to the legal profession
  • Networking Opportunities: Build relationships within the legal community
  • Exposure Across Practice Areas: Civil, criminal, arbitration, corporate disputes, and appellate matters

How to Apply

  1. Prepare Your CV & Cover Letter: Highlight education, internships, legal research or drafting experience, and interest in litigation or corporate law.
  2. Select Your Internship: Choose from multiple opportunities in Mumbai/Navi Mumbai based on your interest and availability.
  3. Submit Applications:
  4. Follow-Up: Ensure your application is professional and timely. Punctuality and dedication are highly valued.

About the Firms & Advocates

Advocate Sonam Pandey – Arth Legal

  • Founding & Managing Partner
  • Practises before Bombay High Court, appellate matters, arbitration, corporate disputes
  • Mentors interns in practical litigation and professional skills

Phoenix Law Chambers

  • Focuses on client-centric services and professional growth
  • Provides exposure to legal research, drafting, client interaction, and case preparation

Keywords for SEO Optimization

  • Legal internship in Mumbai
  • Litigation internship in Navi Mumbai
  • High court internship Mumbai
  • Law firm internships Mumbai
  • Civil and criminal appellate internships
  • Corporate dispute and arbitration internship

Start your legal career today by applying for these internships in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai. Gain practical knowledge, mentorship, and exposure to the professional legal environment while contributing to ongoing cases and client matters.

Apply now and take the first step toward becoming a skilled, confident, and well-prepared legal professional.

  • 20 Shares

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article
Law Drishti »Legal Blogs » FIR Quashing: Can an FIR Be Partially Quashed? Supreme Court’s Bold Decision Awaited

FIR Quashing: Can an FIR Be Partially Quashed? Supreme Court’s Bold Decision Awaited

Quick Apply

Introduction

FIR quashing is a significant legal remedy in the Indian judicial system, allowing the High Court to dismiss an FIR under specific circumstances. The Supreme Court of India is set to examine a crucial legal question—whether an FIR can be partially quashed when a compromise is reached between the victims and only some of the accused. This issue, which has led to conflicting judgments across various High Courts, has now been taken up for scrutiny in the case of Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others. The verdict could significantly impact criminal justice procedures and the backlog of pending cases.

Legal Background

Under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the High Court has the inherent power for FIR quashing against an accused person. This power is typically exercised in cases where continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the judicial process or where it serves the interest of justice.

What is Section 528 BNSS?

Section 528 of BNSS grants High Courts the authority to quash FIRs and criminal proceedings if they believe that the case does not merit further legal action. The court exercises this power primarily to prevent misuse of legal processes, harassment of individuals, or unnecessary prolongation of litigation. This section ensures that judicial discretion is applied in a way that serves the ends of justice while also maintaining balance in the criminal justice system.

Courts have often quashed FIRs when the complainant and the accused have reached a compromise in cases involving personal disputes, particularly in non-serious criminal offenses. However, whether such FIR quashing can be partial, applying only to some of the accused while the case continues against others, is an issue that remains unresolved.

Supreme Court’s Consideration

Recognizing the conflicting judgments across various High Courts, the Supreme Court has agreed to examine the legality of FIR quashing based on partial settlements. The case involves the accused, Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar, who sought relief on the grounds of a compromise with the complainant while the case continued against the remaining accused.

Punit Kumar @Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others

In this case, Puneet Kumar, one of the accused, filed a petition seeking FIR quashing against him on the basis of a compromise reached with the complainant. However, other accused individuals in the case had not entered into a similar compromise. The petitioner argued that since the dispute had been settled as far as he was concerned, the FIR against him should be quashed, even if proceedings continued against the others.

The Supreme Court, acknowledging the conflicting precedents on this issue, issued a notice and kept the proceedings against the petitioner in abeyance while allowing the trial to proceed against the remaining accused. The final ruling in this case will determine whether FIR quashing can be selectively applied for certain individuals while remaining in effect for others.

Conflicting High Court Judgments

Several High Courts have taken divergent views on this issue:

  1. Some High Courts have held that FIRs can only be quashed in their entirety—once registered, an FIR cannot be selectively annulled for certain individuals unless the case as a whole is compromised.
  2. Other High Courts have allowed partial FIR quashing—especially when the settlement involves personal disputes, minor offenses, or when the accused seeking relief played a minimal role in the alleged crime.

This legal uncertainty has led to inconsistent rulings across different jurisdictions, making the Supreme Court’s judgment on this matter highly anticipated.

Impact on the Legal System

If the Supreme Court allows partial FIR quashing, it could:

  • Reduce the burden on courts by allowing settlements for some accused, expediting the resolution process.
  • Ensure fairness by differentiating between degrees of involvement among accused persons in a crime.
  • Set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, bringing uniformity to judicial decisions.
  • Potentially raise concerns about the misuse of such compromises, particularly in cases involving undue influence or coercion.

Conversely, if the court rules against FIR quashing, it would reinforce the principle that FIRs must be quashed entirely or not at all, ensuring that justice follows a uniform and structured path.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others is set to clarify an important aspect of Indian criminal law. If the court permits FIR quashing partially, it could serve as a major step in streamlining criminal justice, reducing pendency, and allowing minor players in a case to seek relief without affecting proceedings against others.

With the Supreme Court expected to issue its ruling in the coming months, all eyes are on this judgment, which will shape how FIR quashing impacts ongoing criminal proceedings.

Stay tuned for further updates on this landmark case!

  • 20 Shares

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now
Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

  • contact@lawdrishti.com
  • Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

  • advertise@lawdrishti.com
  • Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)
Contact us
For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)