Associate Position at Keystone Partners: Disputes Team in Delhi

Call for Applications: Associate Position at Keystone Partners in Delhi

Keystone Partners is excited to announce an opening for an Associate position in our Disputes team in New Delhi. We are seeking an experienced professional who is passionate about legal disputes and eager to contribute to a collaborative work environment.

Areas of Practice for the Associate Position

As an Associate at Keystone Partners, you will work in various legal areas, including:

  • Commercial Litigation: Handle business-related disputes as part of your role.
  • International and Domestic Arbitration: Engage in arbitration processes for conflict resolution.
  • Public Law: Address cases involving government entities and public policy.
  • Insolvency: Assist clients with insolvency proceedings.
  • Personal Law: Manage family law matters and personal disputes.
  • Regulatory Litigation: Deal with compliance-related disputes.
  • Pro Bono Initiatives: Participate in legal assistance for underserved communities.

Requirements for the Associate Position

Candidates interested in the Associate position should meet the following qualifications:

  • Experience: 2-5 years of work experience in disputes.
  • Skills: Strong analytical and communication skills are essential for success.

What We Offer for the Associate Role

At Keystone Partners, we pride ourselves on providing a supportive work culture. We offer opportunities for professional growth, diverse and challenging casework, and a commitment to social responsibility, all of which are integral to the Associate position.

Application Details for Interested Candidates

If you are interested in applying for the Associate position at Keystone Partners, please send your application to newdelhi@keystone.law with the subject line “Recruitment Application October 2024.” The deadline for applications is October 30, 2024. All applications will be treated confidentially.

Next Steps for Shortlisted Candidates

Shortlisted candidates will receive an email invitation for an interview. Join us at Keystone Partners and be part of a team that values excellence in legal practice and social impact. Apply today for the Associate position!


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Supreme Court reaffirms the Panchsheel Test for circumstantial evidence

The Supreme Court has reaffirmed the Panchsheel Test for establishing circumstantial evidence in Shail Kumari vs The State Of Chhattisgarh delivered on 6 August 2025. A bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and K. Vinod Chandran allowed the present appeal and found the Trial Court’s decision based on conjectures and surmises.

The appellant was alleged to have drowned her two children as per circumstantial evidence. The Court referred to the ratio in Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra wherein the five tests for proof of circumstantial evidence was put forward: (1) the accused must be proven guilty and not on conjectures, (2) established facts must be consistent with guilt of the accused, (3) the evidence needs to be of conclusive nature, (4) all other possible hypothesis needs to be removed from speculation and lastly, (5) the chain of evidence must not carry reasonable doubts. 

This is a precedence in appellate reversal of lifetime imprisonment conviction on account of insufficient evidence. The bench found no link between the appellant and the crime in question and the testimony to be highly unreliable and hearsay evidence. The three kinds of witness classification in the case of Vadivelu Thevar was referred to:(i) wholly reliable, (ii) wholly unreliable, and (iii) neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable. 

The law laid down in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda requires the prosecution to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt to demonstrate a chain of circumstances that is so inextricably connected to exclude all other possible deviations from the truth alleged. The Court found no such connections in the present appeal. Therefore, the impugned judgement by the Trial Court dated 18th June 2004 was quashed and set aside.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)