Legal Internships in Bengaluru, Mumbai & New Delhi | Keystone Partners

Legal Internships in Bengaluru, Mumbai & New Delhi | Keystone Partners

Organization:
Keystone Partners is a specialist dispute resolution law firm with expertise in international and domestic arbitration, civil and commercial litigation. Led by seven experienced partners and supported by a highly qualified team of lawyers from India’s top law schools, the firm operates across offices in Bengaluru, Mumbai, and New Delhi. Keystone Partners is committed to providing professional growth opportunities to interns while exposing them to complex legal matters in diverse practice areas.

Locations:

  • Bengaluru: 2nd Floor, 35/2 Cunningham Road, Bengaluru – 560052
  • Mumbai: Office Nos. 311-312, 3rd Floor, Hari Chambers, 58/64 Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400001
  • New Delhi: E-10, Defence Colony, New Delhi – 110024

Position / Vacancies:

  • Legal Internship (Litigation & Arbitration Focus)
  • Mode: Physical / Hybrid (varies by office)
  • Duration: Minimum three weeks (longer preferred)

Eligibility Criteria:

Candidates should meet the following requirements:

  • Law students in:
    • 4th or 5th year of a 5-year program
    • 3rd year of a 3-year LL.B. program
  • Preference will be given to students closer to graduation, as final-year students may be considered for potential recruitment assessments
  • Strong research and drafting skills
  • Interest in litigation, arbitration, and multi-jurisdictional legal matters

This internship is ideal for students seeking exposure to complex litigation, arbitration, and corporate legal practice, while building practical skills for a future legal career.


Key Responsibilities:

Interns at Keystone Partners will have the opportunity to:

  1. Legal Research & Drafting: Conduct in-depth research on assigned cases, statutes, and precedents, and draft petitions, notices, and legal opinions.
  2. Documentation & Filings: Assist in filing court documents, managing case files, and organizing supporting materials.
  3. Court & Conference Observation: Observe court hearings, arbitration proceedings, and client meetings to gain practical insight into case strategy and courtroom conduct.
  4. Multi-Practice Exposure: Work on litigation and arbitration matters across:
    • Civil & Commercial Law
    • Domestic & International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Corporate Law & Insolvency
    • Regulatory Litigation
    • Public Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Labour Law

This broad exposure ensures interns gain a comprehensive understanding of dispute resolution and corporate legal practice.


Stipend / Compensation:

  • A modest stipend is provided for internships of 3+ weeks
  • Final-year students may receive a higher stipend
  • Exact stipend varies by office and will be communicated post-selection

Interns are rewarded for their contribution and dedication while gaining valuable experience in real legal matters.


Why Join Keystone Partners?

Interning at Keystone Partners provides:

  • Hands-On Legal Experience: Participate in research, drafting, case management, and arbitration proceedings
  • Exposure to Diverse Legal Matters: From civil litigation to international arbitration, corporate law, and regulatory issues
  • Mentorship: Work under highly experienced partners and lawyers from top law schools
  • Professional Growth: Learn courtroom procedures, drafting techniques, and arbitration strategies
  • Networking Opportunities: Build connections with seasoned legal professionals across Bengaluru, Mumbai, and New Delhi
  • Career Path Advantage: Strong internship performance may lead to recruitment opportunities or strong references for future roles

Duration & Application Timeline:

  • Minimum internship period: 3 weeks (longer internships preferred)
  • Apply at least 2 months in advance of your intended start date to secure a position
  • Applications are reviewed based on academic performance, research and drafting skills, and interest in dispute resolution

Skills Developed During the Internship:

Interns can expect to enhance the following skills:

  • Legal research and analysis on diverse subjects
  • Drafting pleadings, agreements, notices, and arbitration documents
  • Understanding civil, commercial, corporate, and criminal litigation procedures
  • Observation of court and arbitration strategies in practice
  • Client communication and case management skills
  • Exposure to multi-jurisdictional legal frameworks and international arbitration

These skills are invaluable for students aspiring to litigation, arbitration, corporate law, or dispute resolution careers.


How to Apply:

Interested candidates can apply online via the Keystone Partners internship portal:
https://lnkd.in/g55wB9Nz

Application Tips:

  • Highlight academic achievements, research experience, and relevant internships
  • Emphasize interest in litigation, arbitration, and corporate legal practice
  • Prepare a clear, concise CV showcasing your skills and professional objectives
  • Be proactive in expressing availability and preferred office location

About Keystone Partners:

Keystone Partners is a leading dispute resolution firm with a track record of handling high-stakes litigation and arbitration matters. The firm’s focus on excellence, strategic thinking, and client service provides interns with a unique learning environment. By working at Keystone, interns develop practical legal skills while gaining exposure to cutting-edge legal issues across India and internationally.


Keywords for SEO Optimization:

  • Legal internship Bengaluru
  • Legal internship Mumbai
  • Legal internship New Delhi
  • Arbitration internship India
  • Litigation internship in India
  • Corporate law internship
  • High court legal internship

Start your professional legal journey with Keystone Partners, gain practical litigation and arbitration experience, and develop the skills needed for a successful career in law. Apply now to secure your internship in Bengaluru, Mumbai, or New Delhi and work alongside some of India’s leading dispute resolution lawyers.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Delhi High Court: Anti-CAA protestors bail applications rejected

A Division Bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur at the Delhi High Court have observed on 2 September, 2025 that the February 2020 protest led by a faction of Anti-CAA protestors, that bail applications with regards to Sharjeel Imam and Umer Khalid amongst others, have stood disposed of. The Court has found the protest to have been a “premeditated, well-orchestrated conspiracy to commit unlawful activities threatening the unity, integrity, and sovereignty of India” that cannot be read as res integra to existing judicial interpretation while deciding the grant or refusal of bail to an accused booked for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

The Court has found that the prosecution’s case rests on an alleged deep-rooted conspiracy by the accused to orchestrate large-scale riots in Delhi in protest against the enactment of the CAA and NRC. The conspiracy is stated to have been initiated through the creation of WhatsApp groups and coordination among student bodies and individuals, with the object of organizing round-the-clock sit-in protests across Delhi. The prosecution asserts that these activities involved the development of protest sites, circulation of incite-ful pamphlets, delivery of inflammatory speeches, and propagation of misleading narratives to mobilize the Muslim community, which in turn led to incidents of violence at JMI, Shaheen Bagh, and North-East Delhi. It is further alleged that conspiratorial meetings were held to plan the escalation of protests into riots, with weapons such as firearms, petrol bombs, acid, rods, and stones being stockpiled, alongside measures like dislocating CCTVs and organizing chakka-jaams to disrupt essential supplies. The culmination of these acts is alleged to be the communal riots of February 2020, which resulted in 54 deaths, including a senior police officer and an IB official, grievous injuries to several police personnel and civilians, destruction of over 1,500 public and private properties, and severe damage to communal harmony in the national capital.

The two primary accused “masterminds”, Imam and Khalid were arrested on 20 August 2020. Clashes broke out between anti-CAA and pro-CAA protestors on 23 February 2020. The mob violence picked up pace and led to severe rioting and tense circumstances that resulted in the death of over 54 persons and damage to thousands of public properties, attacks on journalists by pro-CAA protestors. ThePrint journalists uncovered a rare show of interfaith Hindu-Muslim solidarity during this time. 

Delhi High Court clarified, however, that the present observations are confined to the consideration of bail and shall not affect the merits of the case, which remain subject to cross-examination and trial. Consequently, the bail appeals were dismissed.

The appeals by Athar Khan, Shadab Ahmad and Saleem Khan were not considered by the Court. Allegations suggest their presence in various meetings and especially on the intervening night of 23 February 2020 were alleged discussions to further violence against Policemen and non-Muslims. Similarly, the appeals by Shifa-ur-Rehman and Meeran Haider. The appellants have said that the claims are general and unsubstantiated, resting largely on their passive attendance at meetings, inclusion in WhatsApp groups, or association with legitimate student and alumni bodies, without any specific evidence demonstrating intent, preparation, or involvement in a terrorist act or conspiracy. In dismissing their appeals, the Court mentioned mere completion of investigation would not be a material change in the circumstance to grant bail considering the seriousness of allegations levelled.

In rejecting the plea by Gulfisha Fatima, the Court stressed that comparisons cannot be made to co-accused released on bail since the role ascribed to the appellants on record is vastly different. By reasoning that the preservation of the broader legislative intent and striking a balance on individual liberty and rule of law, has necessitated the rejection of applications.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)