Hiring Now: Associate – Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) | Lexclaim Advocates, Delhi

Hiring Now: Associate – Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) | Lexclaim Advocates, Delhi

Organization Overview
Lexclaim Advocates is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi, with associate offices in major Indian cities. The firm specializes in Company Law, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Franchising, and Litigation, providing comprehensive solutions to a diverse client base including startups, multinational corporations, entrepreneurs, and established businesses. The firm is recognized for its client-centric approach, expertise in litigation and advisory services, and its commitment to high standards of professionalism, integrity, and efficiency.

The IPR Team at Lexclaim Advocates focuses on assisting clients in protecting, enforcing, and monetizing their intellectual property assets. The team handles trademarks, copyrights, patents, designs, licensing agreements, and commercial contracts, ensuring clients’ intellectual property rights are secured and strategically managed. By combining litigation experience with transactional expertise, Lexclaim Advocates offers young professionals a rich platform to develop and grow in Intellectual Property Law.

Location: Delhi

Position / Experience Details
Lexclaim Advocates is looking for a Legal Associate to join its Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) team.

  • Position: Associate – IPR Team
  • Experience: 0–1 year of Post-Qualification Experience (PQE)
  • Employment Type: Full-time
  • Mode: In-office

This role is ideal for law graduates or early-career lawyers with a keen interest in IPR litigation, advisory, and transactional work, offering a combination of hands-on experience and mentorship from senior legal professionals.

Eligibility Criteria
Candidates must meet the following criteria to be considered:

  • A law degree (LL.B.) from a recognized university.
  • 0–1 year of PQE, preferably with exposure to Intellectual Property matters.
  • Strong legal research and drafting skills, with precision and attention to detail.
  • Proficient written and verbal communication skills.
  • Knowledge of court procedures, IPR processes, and legal terminology.
  • Familiarity with legal research databases and technology tools is an advantage.
  • Ability to work independently and in a team environment, managing tasks efficiently.

Key Responsibilities
As a Legal Associate in the IPR Team, responsibilities will include:

  • Handling and assisting in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) matters such as trademarks, copyrights, patents, designs, and IP enforcement cases.
  • Drafting legal documents, including petitions, responses, notices, agreements, and submissions for courts, tribunals, and IP offices.
  • Conducting legal research on case laws, statutory provisions, and precedents relevant to IPR and commercial matters.
  • Preparing research briefs, case summaries, and legal opinions for senior associates and partners.
  • Supporting litigation and advisory work, including filing cases, responding to objections, and managing deadlines.
  • Liaising with clients, external counsels, and internal teams for case updates and advisory requirements.
  • Assisting seniors in hearings, client meetings, and regulatory proceedings.
  • Monitoring latest developments in IPR, Company Law, and related regulatory frameworks.
  • Contributing to knowledge management initiatives, maintaining templates, precedents, and internal documentation.

This role provides exposure to both litigation and transactional assignments, enabling associates to develop a holistic understanding of Intellectual Property practice and the practical application of law in corporate and commercial contexts.

Why Join Lexclaim Advocates?
Joining Lexclaim Advocates as an IPR Associate offers significant career development opportunities:

  • Exposure to challenging and diverse cases across industries, including startups, corporate clients, and high-value IP disputes.
  • Hands-on training in drafting, legal research, contract review, and litigation strategy.
  • Opportunity to work closely with experienced professionals, gaining mentorship and guidance.
  • Career progression opportunities, including advancement to senior associate roles within the firm.
  • Networking with clients, industry professionals, and peer law firms, enhancing professional visibility.
  • Learning best practices in IPR, litigation, advisory, and corporate law, preparing candidates for future leadership roles.
  • Potential to contribute to knowledge sharing initiatives, workshops, and client training sessions.

Remuneration

  • Compensation will be as per industry standards and commensurate with the candidate’s experience and performance.

How to Apply
Interested candidates should send their CV and a cover letter to career@lexclaim.com with the subject line: “Application – Associate (IPR Team)”.

Application Deadline: Apply early as positions may be filled on a rolling basis.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Junior Lawyers Vakalatnama: The Hidden Risks & Legal Challenges

Junior Lawyers Vakalatnama: Can They Appear in Court Without One?

In the legal profession, junior lawyers vakalatnama requirements often raise questions about their courtroom authority. Junior lawyers frequently assist their seniors in legal proceedings, but can they appear in court without a vakalatnama based solely on oral instructions? This remains a grey area in legal practice.

Understanding the Junior Lawyers Vakalatnama Provision

A vakalatnama is a formal document that authorizes an advocate to appear, plead, and act on behalf of a client in a legal matter. The Bombay High Court Manual provides an exception: If a lawyer who has already filed a vakalatnama engages another lawyer, the latter does not require a separate vakalatnama. This provision offers flexibility, avoiding the inconvenience of obtaining fresh client authorizations whenever a new team member appears in court.

Traditionally, courts have allowed junior lawyers to make submissions on behalf of their seniors without demanding a vakalatnama, trusting the face value of the senior lawyer. However, this practice has been challenged recently, with judges taking a more rigid stance.

The Growing Strictness Around Junior Lawyers Vakalatnama Rules

While earlier, it was common for judges to accept submissions from junior lawyers based on their senior’s oral instructions, recent cases suggest a shift towards a stricter approach. The primary concern is whether the junior has formal authorization to act on behalf of the client. Instances of unauthorized individuals making misleading submissions have contributed to this growing apprehension.

Moreover, there is a client representation aspect to consider. When a client hires a senior lawyer, is there an implicit understanding that the senior can delegate court appearances to a junior? There is no explicit rule that requires client consent for such delegation, leaving a grey area that remains unaddressed.

Risks and Misuse of Junior Lawyers Appearing Without a Vakalatnama

The practice of junior lawyers appearing without a vakalatnama poses certain risks:

  1. Lack of Accountability: If a junior lawyer makes an incorrect submission, the client may suffer. Should the responsibility fall on the junior, the senior, or the court for allowing the appearance?
  2. Strategic Blame-Shifting: Some senior lawyers might use juniors as a shield—if a submission is accepted, all is well; if rejected, the senior can later appear and disown the junior’s arguments.
  3. Unauthorized Submissions: There have been instances where individuals, not legally authorized, have misled the court. The absence of clear rules creates room for exploitation.

Need for Clearer Junior Lawyers Vakalatnama Guidelines

The ongoing confusion calls for explicit regulations addressing:

  • Whether a junior appearing without a vakalatnama needs express client consent.
  • The extent of submissions a junior lawyer can make without senior supervision.
  • Measures to prevent unauthorized individuals from making submissions.
  • A balance between courtroom efficiency and protecting clients’ interests.

Conclusion

While allowing junior lawyers to appear without a vakalatnama ensures flexibility, the risks associated with misuse cannot be ignored. Courts and bar councils should consider clearer policies to prevent legal ambiguities while maintaining professional efficiency. Until then, junior lawyers and their seniors must tread cautiously to avoid procedural disputes that could impact their cases and client interests.

Written By – Ankur R. Jahagirdar


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)