Assessment Internship – S.S. Rana & Co. (Delhi | IP Litigation & Trademark Team)

Assessment Internship – S.S. Rana & Co. (Delhi | IP Litigation & Trademark Team)

About the Organization

S.S. Rana & Co. is a premier Indian law firm specializing in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Corporate Law, and allied legal services. Headquartered in New Delhi, with branch offices across India, the firm has built a reputation for excellence and reliability over several decades of practice. It is one of the few intellectual property law firms in India that is registered as an Advocate on Record with the Supreme Court of India, which allows it to represent clients across all judicial forums ranging from district courts to the apex court.

The firm caters to a diverse clientele that includes multinational corporations, Indian conglomerates, start-ups, and individual innovators. With an experienced team of lawyers, trademark attorneys, patent agents, and paralegals, S.S. Rana & Co. offers comprehensive services covering litigation, prosecution, enforcement, and advisory work. The firm is especially known for its strength in trademark disputes, copyright matters, domain name disputes, and complex IP litigation.

For young law graduates seeking to build a career in intellectual property and litigation, the firm offers a structured internship program that provides real-time exposure to cases, mentorship from senior professionals, and practical training in the nuances of IP law.

Location

The internship will be conducted at the firm’s head office located in South Delhi. This is a physical, in-office internship and candidates are required to attend the office during the tenure of the internship.

Position and Duration

  • Position: Assessment Internship – IP Litigation / Trademark Team
  • Duration: Assessment-based (not specifically mentioned; subject to performance and firm’s requirements)

This internship is designed as an assessment program, which means performance during the internship may be evaluated for potential long-term engagement with the firm. It provides a valuable opportunity for law graduates to showcase their legal skills, research ability, and drafting competence while learning from seasoned professionals in one of India’s leading IP law firms.

Eligibility Criteria

To apply for the internship, candidates must meet the following requirements:

  • Must be a Law Graduate (3-year LL.B. or 5-year integrated B.A. LL.B. program from a recognized institution).
  • Strong interest in Intellectual Property Rights, specifically trademark law and litigation.
  • Good legal research and drafting skills.
  • Ability to analyze statutes, judgments, and case laws with precision.
  • Strong written and verbal communication skills.
  • Professional conduct, punctuality, and willingness to work in a team-oriented environment.

While prior exposure to intellectual property law through courses, internships, or moot courts will be an advantage, it is not mandatory.

Key Responsibilities

Interns selected for the Assessment Internship will work closely with the IP Litigation and Trademark team. Their responsibilities will include:

  1. Legal Research: Conducting thorough research on statutes, case law, and international conventions relevant to intellectual property and trademark litigation.
  2. Drafting and Documentation: Assisting in the preparation of pleadings, applications, written submissions, and case notes. Drafting legal opinions, client advisories, and internal memoranda.
  3. Case Preparation: Supporting senior lawyers in preparing briefs for hearings, organizing evidence, and compiling supporting documents.
  4. Court Exposure: Observing live court proceedings, including trademark hearings, injunction applications, and appeals in various courts.
  5. Trademark Practice: Gaining hands-on experience in trademark oppositions, cancellations, infringement suits, and enforcement actions.
  6. Client Assistance: Helping the team with client-related queries and understanding the practical issues businesses face in protecting their intellectual property.

Benefits of the Internship

Interning at S.S. Rana & Co. offers multiple professional benefits:

  • Direct exposure to intellectual property litigation and trademark practice.
  • Training under experienced Advocates on Record and IP professionals.
  • Opportunity to understand both litigation strategy and client advisory aspects.
  • Practical experience in drafting, research, and case preparation.
  • Mentorship and structured guidance from senior associates and partners.
  • Possibility of long-term engagement with the firm based on performance.

This internship is particularly valuable for law graduates interested in pursuing a career in IP law, litigation, or corporate advisory practice.

Stipend

The stipend for this internship has not been specified. Candidates should note that the primary benefit of the internship lies in the exposure, skill-building, and assessment-based nature of the opportunity.

Application Process

Interested candidates should send their updated CVs to the following email address:

Email: hr@ssrana.com

Applicants are encouraged to include a brief, well-drafted cover letter highlighting their interest in intellectual property litigation, prior academic or internship experience in IP law (if any), and career aspirations.

Applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis. Since this is an assessment internship with limited availability, early applications are strongly recommended.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Relief in Kedar Nath Yadav only applicable to vulnerable cultivators and not industrial entities

In State of West Bengal v. M/s Santi Ceramics Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Calcutta High Court’s order directing restoration of 28 bighas of land in Singur to the respondent company, holding that the relief in Kedar Nath Yadav v. State of West Bengal (AIR 2016 SC 4156) applied only to vulnerable cultivators and not to industrial entities that had voluntarily accepted compensation.

The case arose from the 2006 acquisition of land in Hooghly for the TATA Motors “NANO Project.” The respondent company, which had purchased and converted the land for industrial use in 2001–02, objected to the acquisition but accepted full compensation for structures, without challenge. A decade later, following this Court’s judgment in Kedar Nath Yadav quashing the acquisition and ordering restoration to “landowners/cultivators,” the respondent sought parity and filed a writ petition for return of its land.

The Single Judge and Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court accepted the plea, reasoning that Kedar Nath Yadav extended equally to all landowners regardless of whether they were cultivators or corporations.

Before the Supreme Court, the State argued that the 2016 judgment in Kedar Nath Yadav was a limited equitable remedy crafted for dispossessed farmers who lacked legal and financial capacity to contest unlawful acquisition, and not a blanket restitution for all parties. It was also contended that the respondent’s acceptance of compensation and inaction for ten years constituted acquiescence and estoppel.

The Court agreed, holding that Kedar Nath Yadav’s relief was socio-legal in nature, directed at remedying structural injustice to “the weakest sections of society,” i.e., poor cultivators whose livelihood depended on the acquired land. The respondent, being a commercial entity with industrial infrastructure and financial capacity, could not claim benefit from a judgment conceived for agrarian protection.

Further, the Court held that quashing of acquisition in Kedar Nath Yadav operated “in personam” for those who had pursued the challenge, not “in rem” for all affected persons. The respondent’s decade-long silence and voluntary receipt of compensation extinguished any surviving right of restoration. The Court also noted the practical impossibility of restoring land after extensive reallocation to farmers following TATA’s exit.

Accordingly, the appeal was allowed. The High Court’s orders were quashed, and the respondent’s writ petition was dismissed. The Court, however, permitted the respondent to remove remaining structures or have them auctioned, with the option to receive auction proceeds, directing completion of this process within four months.

Takeaway: Relief in Kedar Nath Yadav was a targeted social protection for dispossessed cultivators, not a universal restitution mechanism. Industrial entities that accepted compensation and remained silent cannot later claim parity or restoration on grounds of equity.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)