UPSC Recruitment 2025 – 30 Legal & Finance Vacancies under SFIO and Ministry of Corporate Affairs

The UPSC Recruitment 2025 SFIO Ministry of Corporate Affairs drive has opened applications for 30 crucial roles aimed at bolstering India’s enforcement in corporate governance and financial fraud detection. This is a major opportunity for lawyers, chartered accountants, forensic auditors, and company secretaries who want to make a meaningful impact through public service.

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) is inviting online applications for these positions under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, including the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO)—a premier white-collar crime investigation agency. Candidates will work on complex legal and financial investigations that involve corporate fraud, regulatory non-compliance, and criminal prosecution under key Indian laws.

Key Application Dates

  • Start Date for Applications: 14 June 2025
  • Last Date to Apply Online: 3 July 2025 (Till 23:59 HRS)
  • Last Date to Print Submitted Application: 4 July 2025 (Till 23:59 HRS)

Total Number of Vacancies: 30

1. Assistant Director (Corporate Law) – SFIO

  • Vacancies: 3
  • Pay Level: Level-07 (7th Central Pay Commission)
  • Upper Age Limit: 30 years (UR), 40 years (Persons with Benchmark Disabilities – PwBD)
  • Minimum Educational Qualification:
    • Bachelor’s Degree in Law (3-year or 5-year program), OR
    • A degree in any discipline plus membership with the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI)
  • Desirable Experience:
    • At least 1 year of experience in handling corporate law matters
    • Experience in collecting and analyzing documentary evidence
    • Prior exposure to drafting legal reports, notices, or filings in regulatory proceedings
  • Key Duties: Legal research, investigation of violations, assistance in prosecution of corporate crimes under Indian company law statutes.

2. Company Prosecutor – Ministry of Corporate Affairs

  • Vacancies: 25
  • Pay Level: Level-07 (7th CPC)
  • Upper Age Limit:
    • 30 years (UR/EWS), 33 years (OBC), 35 years (SC/ST), and 40 years (PwBD)
  • Educational Qualification:
    • Bachelor’s Degree in Law or a 5-year integrated Law Degree recognized by the Bar Council of India.
  • Job Role:
    • Appear before courts and tribunals to conduct prosecutions under the Companies Act.
    • Prepare and present legal arguments, represent the government in company law violation cases, and work in coordination with SFIO or Registrar of Companies when necessary.
  • Ideal for: Fresh or early-career advocates who are ready for courtroom exposure and want to shape corporate legal enforcement in India.

3. Assistant Director (Banking) – SFIO

  • Vacancies: 2
  • Pay Level: Level-08 (7th CPC)
  • Upper Age Limit: 30 years (EWS), 35 years (SC)
  • Minimum Educational Qualification:
    • Chartered Accountant (CA) / Cost Accountant / Company Secretary (CS) / Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA), OR
    • Master’s Degree in Commerce, Business Administration (Finance), or Economics
  • Desirable Experience:
    • Minimum 1 year of auditing or forensic auditing experience in banking or financial institutions
  • Key Responsibilities:
    • Investigate financial frauds, prepare forensic audit reports, and assist in prosecution of complex economic offenses under banking and corporate laws.

Location and Service Commitment

  • Primary Location: New Delhi
  • Service Liability: All roles come with All India Service Liability (AISL), meaning selected candidates may be posted across India based on organizational needs.

How to Apply

  • Apply Online via UPSC’s official site: https://upsconline.gov.in/
  • Read the Official Notification here: Notification PDF
  • Mode of Application: Online only
  • Ensure all required documents are uploaded as per UPSC instructions.

Why These Roles Matter

These positions under the UPSC Recruitment 2025 SFIO Ministry of Corporate Affairs offer:

  • A stable and well-compensated central government job
  • A role in strengthening India’s regulatory enforcement systems
  • The chance to work on high-profile investigations involving corporate misconduct, financial frauds, and white-collar crime
  • A gateway for lawyers and finance professionals to step into a public service career with nationwide impact

Tips for Applicants

  • Make sure your application reflects relevant education, legal or audit experience, and an understanding of the Companies Act, SEBI regulations, or financial investigation practices
  • Prepare for the interview stage with a strong grasp of regulatory frameworks and real-world corporate case studies

Final Words

The UPSC Recruitment 2025 SFIO Ministry of Corporate Affairs process is now live. With just 30 seats for highly respected roles, this is a competitive and prestigious opportunity for India’s legal and financial professionals.

Whether you’re aiming to work in the courtroom, boardroom, or field investigations, these roles promise meaningful work in one of the country’s most vital enforcement institutions. Don’t miss your chance to apply before 3 July 2025.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Nicaragua v United States Explained

Landmark ICJ Ruling: Nicaragua v. United States Explained

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered a pivotal ruling in the case of Nicaragua v United States on June 27, 1986. This decision significantly shaped international law regarding sovereignty and the use of force. In this case, Nicaragua alleged that the U.S. violated its sovereignty through covert military actions, including support for the Contra rebels and direct military interventions.

Key Facts of the Case

Initially, Nicaragua claimed that the U.S. engaged in a range of unlawful activities starting in 1981. Specifically, these included:

  • Support for the Contras: The U.S. allegedly recruited and armed this rebel group to undermine Nicaragua’s government.
  • Direct Military Actions: Moreover, the U.S. was accused of mining Nicaraguan ports and conducting aerial incursions.
  • Economic Sanctions: Additionally, Nicaragua argued that U.S. sanctions were designed to destabilize its economy.

Nicaragua contended that these actions violated key principles of international law, such as the prohibition on the use of force and the non-intervention principle, as outlined in the United Nations Charter.

Jurisdiction and Procedural History

In April 1984, Nicaragua filed its application with the ICJ, asserting that the Court had jurisdiction based on customary international law. Conversely, the U.S. contested this, arguing its actions were justified under the right to collective self-defense in response to Nicaragua’s support for insurgents in El Salvador. However, the ICJ affirmed its jurisdiction, emphasizing the applicability of customary law.

The Court’s Decision on Nicaragua v United States

Ultimately, the ICJ ruled in favor of Nicaragua, finding that the United States violated international law through its military and paramilitary activities. The Court’s key findings included:

  • Violation of Sovereignty: First and foremost, the U.S. breached Nicaragua’s sovereignty by supporting the Contras and conducting direct military actions.
  • Prohibition on Use of Force: Furthermore, the U.S. actions were deemed contrary to Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter.
  • Rejection of Self-Defense Claim: Finally, the Court determined that there was no sufficient evidence of an armed attack by Nicaragua that would warrant U.S. intervention.

Significance of the Ruling

This ruling is crucial for several reasons:

  • Affirmation of Customary International Law: It reinforced the importance of customary norms against the use of force and non-intervention, independent of treaty obligations.
  • Clarification of Self-Defense: The Court outlined strict criteria for legitimate self-defense, emphasizing necessity and proportionality.
  • Impact on Superpower Policies: Notably, the decision challenged interventionist policies of powerful states, asserting that international law applies universally.

Aftermath

Despite the ICJ’s order for the U.S. to cease its actions and provide reparations, the United States did not comply with the ruling. Nevertheless, this landmark case remains influential in discussions of state sovereignty, intervention, and the legal boundaries of self-defense.

In conclusion, the Nicaragua v. United States case serves as a vital reference point in international law. Ultimately, it demonstrates the ICJ’s role in upholding legal norms and principles in the face of state power.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)