Law Drishti Logo
Law Drishti Logo
Contact
Submit Posts

Patent Drafting and Prosecution Professional at Khurana & Khurana (Multiple Locations)

[ld_community_badge]

Ongoing

[ld_community]

Patent Drafting and Prosecution Professional opportunities are opening up at Khurana & Khurana (K&K), one of India’s premier full-service law firms. With a robust reputation built over 18 years, K&K invites applications from highly skilled legal and technical professionals for full-time roles in its expanding Patent Drafting and Prosecution practice.

This role is ideal for candidates with a deep interest in patent law, strong analytical abilities, and an aptitude for converting complex technical ideas into well-articulated legal documents. If you’re looking for a high-growth environment where you can work on cutting-edge innovation while advising Fortune 500 clients and tech-driven startups, this opportunity is for you.

About Khurana & Khurana (K&K)

Khurana & Khurana is a full-service law firm offering expert legal services across Intellectual Property (IP), Corporate & Commercial Law, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Technology Law, Media & Entertainment Law, and Compliance. With a strong presence across multiple Indian cities and growing international collaborations, the firm is known for its commercial acumen, technical depth, and precise legal execution.

K&K’s Patent and Prosecution Team supports clients ranging from individual inventors to multinational corporations in drafting, prosecuting, and defending their patent rights across Indian and global jurisdictions.

Position Overview

  • Title: Patent Drafting and Prosecution Professional
  • Organization: Khurana & Khurana (K&K)
  • Location: Multiple Offices – Greater Noida, Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad
  • Position Type: Full-time
  • Experience Required: Minimum 3 years in Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Key Responsibilities

As a Patent Drafting and Prosecution Professional, you will be part of a team that delivers strategic, high-quality patent protection services. Your core responsibilities will include:

  • Drafting patent applications aligned with the Indian Patent Act and international protocols
  • Handling complete patent prosecution lifecycle before the Indian Patent Office (IPO), including preparing and filing responses to First Examination Reports (FERs)
  • Representing clients during patent hearings and interacting with patent examiners
  • Interpreting and understanding complex technical subject matter across various domains (mechanical, biotech, chemical, electrical, software, AI, etc.)
  • Assisting with client interactions, providing updates, gathering invention disclosures, and resolving queries
  • Managing docketing systems, keeping track of deadlines, and maintaining detailed case records
  • Participating in internal knowledge-sharing sessions, training junior team members, and contributing to client development initiatives
  • Preparing case studies, white papers, and content for speaking engagements or webinars

This position requires not only technical accuracy and legal insight but also strong communication and interpersonal skills to build long-term client relationships.

Ideal Candidate Profile

To succeed as a Patent Drafting and Prosecution Professional, you should possess the following qualifications and attributes:

Educational Background:

  • Bachelor’s degree in science, engineering, or technology (required)
  • Master’s degree or Ph.D. in relevant technical fields (preferred)
  • Registered Patent Agent (India) is a strong advantage

Professional Experience:

  • At least 3 years of hands-on experience in patent drafting, specification writing, and prosecution in Indian and/or international jurisdictions
  • Experience in working with various sectors such as biotech, pharmaceuticals, electronics, AI/ML, and mechanical systems
  • Exposure to prosecution strategies for both domestic and foreign filings (USPTO, EPO, PCT route, etc.)

Skills and Competencies:

  • Excellent command over patent law and understanding of IP lifecycle management
  • High level of technical comprehension across multiple subject areas
  • Precision in legal writing, including claims drafting and FER responses
  • Self-driven and detail-oriented work ethic
  • Good project management and organizational abilities
  • Strong interpersonal communication for internal coordination and client interaction
  • A collaborative attitude with a growth mindset

Why Join Khurana & Khurana?

K&K offers a dynamic and innovation-friendly environment that combines legal rigor with technical complexity. Here are a few compelling reasons to join:

  • Work with a top-tier IP team recognized nationally and internationally
  • Exposure to high-profile patent portfolios, litigation support, and international patent filings
  • Structured learning and development programs for upskilling
  • Opportunities to publish, speak at conferences, and contribute to global IP discourse
  • Access to a culture that values merit, performance, and team contribution
  • Opportunity to mentor and train junior professionals
  • Career growth across multiple practice areas, including corporate, litigation, and regulatory law

Work Locations

Openings are available across multiple Indian cities, including:

  • Greater Noida (HQ)
  • Delhi
  • Mumbai
  • Pune
  • Chennai
  • Bangalore
  • Hyderabad

Candidates may indicate their location preference when applying.

Application Process

If you’re ready to take your patent law career to the next level, send your application to:

Email: careers@khuranaandkhurana.com
Subject Line: Application for Patent Drafting and Prosecution – [Your Name]

Please include:

  • Updated resume
  • Cover letter highlighting relevant patent experience
  • List of patent applications filed or prosecuted (if applicable)
  • Any published articles, blogs, or speaking experience in IP

Shortlisted candidates will be contacted for interviews and skill assessments.

Final Thoughts

A role as a Patent Drafting and Prosecution Professional at Khurana & Khurana offers the perfect blend of technical engagement, legal depth, and professional growth. Whether you are a registered patent agent, a technically trained lawyer, or an experienced drafter, this is your chance to work on cutting-edge innovations and help clients protect their intellectual capital effectively.

Join a firm where legal brilliance meets innovation.
Apply now and become part of K&K’s legacy of IP excellence.

  • 20 Shares

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article
Law Drishti »Case Briefs » Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India

Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India

Quick Apply

Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India (2018): A Landmark Judgment on Decriminalization of Same-Sex Relations

Case Title: Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Citation: AIR 2018 SC 4321
Date of Decision: September 6, 2018
Bench: Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra

Background of Section 377 and Historical Context

The Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India case involved Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This law, enacted during British rule in 1860, criminalized “carnal intercourse against the order of nature.” For many years, it was used to target consensual same-sex relationships.

In 2009, the Delhi High Court decriminalized consensual homosexual acts in Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi. However, the Supreme Court reversed this decision in 2013 in the case of Suresh Kumar Koushal v Naz Foundation, reactivating Section 377.

The petitioners in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, including dancer Navtej Singh Johar, challenged the law. They argued that it violated their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Indian Constitution.

Key Issues in the Case

The case raised several important constitutional questions:

  1. Constitutionality of Section 377: Did Section 377 violate fundamental rights, including equality, privacy, and freedom of expression?
  2. Vagueness of Section 377: Was the law’s definition of “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” vague and arbitrary?
  3. Social Morality vs. Constitutional Morality: How much weight should social morality carry in interpreting constitutional rights?

Petitioners’ Arguments

The petitioners, in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, presented several strong arguments:

Violation of Equality and Non-Discrimination (Article 14)

The petitioners argued that Section 377 was discriminatory. It criminalized consensual same-sex acts but did not punish similar acts between heterosexuals. This, they claimed, violated the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Violation of Right to Dignity and Privacy (Article 21)

The petitioners further argued that Section 377 violated their right to privacy. In the case, they referred to the landmark Puttaswamy judgment, which recognized sexual orientation as a fundamental aspect of privacy.

Violation of Freedom of Expression (Article 19)

The petitioners also emphasized that sexual orientation is part of personal expression. Criminalizing same-sex relations, they argued, infringed upon their right to freedom of expression under Article 19.

Constitutional Morality over Social Morality

The petitioners asserted that laws should be based on constitutional morality. In their view, Section 377 was rooted in outdated Victorian values and not in line with modern constitutional principles.

Human Dignity and Protection from Harassment

Finally, the petitioners argued that Section 377 led to the harassment and marginalization of LGBTQ+ individuals. The law, they contended, promoted discrimination, alienation, and social exclusion.

Union of India’s Position

The Union of India did not defend Section 377 in the case. The government took a neutral stance, leaving the matter to the Court’s discretion. Some intervenors, however, argued that decriminalizing same-sex relations could harm public morality.

Supreme Court’s Judgment

The Supreme Court delivered a landmark ruling in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India. The Court read down Section 377 to exclude consensual homosexual acts between adults. The law remained applicable for acts involving minors, bestiality, and non-consensual relations.

Unconstitutionality of Section 377 for Consensual Same-Sex Relations

The Court ruled that Section 377 violated the Constitution, particularly Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21. It found that criminalizing consensual same-sex acts violated the fundamental rights to equality, dignity, privacy, and freedom of expression.

Right to Equality (Article 14)

The Court ruled that Section 377 violated Article 14 by creating an arbitrary and irrational distinction based on sexual orientation. The law had no legitimate connection to any state interest.

Right to Privacy and Dignity (Article 21)

The Court emphasized that sexual orientation is an integral part of one’s identity. Justice Chandrachud, in his opinion, noted that criminalizing same-sex relations violated the right to personal autonomy and freedom.

Constitutional Morality vs. Social Morality

The Court highlighted that laws must align with constitutional values, such as equality and dignity. It affirmed that constitutional morality should prevail over social morality, which can be discriminatory or regressive.

Freedom of Expression (Article 19)

Justice Malhotra emphasized that sexual orientation is a form of self-expression. In the Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India case, the Court ruled that criminalizing it violated the right to freedom of expression, as it stifled individual identity.

Protection of LGBTQ+ Rights

The judgment acknowledged the long-standing discrimination faced by LGBTQ+ individuals. The Court ruled that they were entitled to equal treatment and protection of their rights as citizens.

Conclusion

The ruling in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India marked a historic victory for LGBTQ+ rights in India. The Supreme Court’s judgment decriminalized same-sex relations, affirming the constitutional principles of equality, dignity, privacy, and freedom of expression. This decision reflects a shift in India’s legal framework, where constitutional values now take precedence over outdated societal norms.

While Section 377 remains in place for non-consensual acts and bestiality, the Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India case represents a significant step toward securing equal rights for LGBTQ+ individuals in India.

Read More – Click Here

  • 20 Shares

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now
Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

  • contact@lawdrishti.com
  • Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

  • advertise@lawdrishti.com
  • Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)
Contact us
For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)