Legal Internship at Kunal Khanna & Co. | Apply Now – IPR & Litigation Internship in New Delhi

Legal Interns at Kunal Khanna & Co. (New Delhi | Intellectual Property & Litigation Focus)

About the Organization
Kunal Khanna & Co. is a full-service law firm founded in 2017 by Mr. Kunal Khanna. In a relatively short span, the firm has established itself as a trusted name in the Indian legal industry, especially in complex litigation and intellectual property enforcement. The firm’s primary areas of practice include matters under the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) laws, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, as well as diverse civil and criminal disputes. With a growing client base and a commitment to providing solution-oriented legal strategies, the firm has developed a strong reputation for professionalism, innovation, and result-oriented practice.

For law students aspiring to build a career in litigation or specialize in intellectual property law, the internship at Kunal Khanna & Co. offers an excellent opportunity. Interns here gain exposure not only to research and drafting but also to practical aspects of IP enforcement, counterfeit action, arbitration, and commercial litigation. The firm believes in involving interns in real work that contributes to live cases, making this a valuable platform for practical learning.

Location
The internship is strictly on-site at the firm’s office in Jangpura, New Delhi. This ensures that interns can participate actively in day-to-day legal work, client interactions, and courtroom preparations.

Position
The opportunity is open for Legal Interns (full-time, in-office only). While the exact number of vacancies is not specified, applications are considered on a rolling basis, meaning students can apply as early as possible for available slots.

Eligibility Criteria
The internship is open to motivated and disciplined law students with a strong interest in litigation and intellectual property. Candidates must be enrolled in a recognized law program and should preferably be in their third year or above of a five-year integrated course or in their second year or above of a three-year LL.B. course. Students must demonstrate good research and drafting skills, a keen interest in intellectual property and commercial litigation, and a professional attitude. The internship requires full-time commitment from the office, so only those who can work on-site in Delhi should apply. Prior internship experience in litigation or IPR would be an advantage but is not mandatory.

Responsibilities of Interns
Interns at Kunal Khanna & Co. are entrusted with a variety of meaningful responsibilities, designed to help them develop both theoretical and practical legal skills. The key areas of work include:

  • Drafting support: Interns will assist the team in preparing legal notices, plaints, injunctions, replies, and written statements. This helps in learning the structure and language of litigation documents.
  • Counterfeit enforcement: Interns will contribute to enforcement activities against counterfeit goods by preparing reports, coordinating with Local Commissioners during enforcement drives, and compiling evidence for court proceedings.
  • Legal research: Students will conduct research on case law, analyze statutory provisions, and study precedents under laws such as the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the Copyright Act, 1957, and allied procedural statutes.
  • Digital enforcement: Interns will assist in handling infringement matters on online platforms, including e-commerce portals and social media websites, by preparing takedown notices and compliance reports.
  • Litigation preparation: Interns will support the firm’s lawyers in maintaining case files, preparing briefs, summarizing case laws, and assisting with court hearing preparations.
  • Administrative and client support: Interns will also gain exposure to day-to-day office functioning, drafting correspondence, and handling client communications where necessary.

This balanced range of tasks ensures that interns are not limited to research alone but also gain exposure to enforcement, litigation strategy, and client-side interactions.

Learning Opportunities and Benefits
The internship is structured to provide active learning and hands-on training. Some of the key benefits for interns include:

  • Exposure to real-world litigation strategy and courtroom practice.
  • Practical training in intellectual property enforcement, both offline and digital.
  • Development of drafting skills by preparing pleadings, notices, and legal documents.
  • Mentorship under experienced lawyers and the opportunity to observe the nuances of case handling.
  • Direct involvement in research that supports live matters before courts and tribunals.
  • Building confidence in legal writing, analytical reasoning, and procedural law.
  • A certificate of internship on successful completion, with the possibility of future opportunities at the firm for outstanding performers.

For law students seeking a career in litigation or intellectual property, this internship provides a well-rounded platform to explore both substantive law and procedure.

Stipend
The internship notice does not specify any stipend. Applicants should consider this primarily a learning-oriented opportunity. Exceptional performers may receive recognition or further opportunities with the firm.

Application Procedure
Interested candidates must follow the application process carefully:

  1. Prepare an updated CV that highlights academic achievements, prior internships, and relevant coursework.
  2. Draft a short cover note explaining your interest in intellectual property rights and litigation, your motivation to join Kunal Khanna & Co., and how you can contribute as an intern.
  3. Email both the CV and cover note to jobs.kunalkhannaco@gmail.com.
  4. Ensure that the subject line is formatted exactly as follows:
    “Application – Internship (IPR) – <Your Name>”.

Applications without the correct subject line or without a cover note may not be considered. Since this is an on-site internship, applicants should ensure that they are available to work from the firm’s Delhi office for the full duration.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

FIR Quashing: Can an FIR Be Partially Quashed? Supreme Court’s Bold Decision Awaited

Introduction

FIR quashing is a significant legal remedy in the Indian judicial system, allowing the High Court to dismiss an FIR under specific circumstances. The Supreme Court of India is set to examine a crucial legal question—whether an FIR can be partially quashed when a compromise is reached between the victims and only some of the accused. This issue, which has led to conflicting judgments across various High Courts, has now been taken up for scrutiny in the case of Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others. The verdict could significantly impact criminal justice procedures and the backlog of pending cases.

Legal Background

Under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the High Court has the inherent power for FIR quashing against an accused person. This power is typically exercised in cases where continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the judicial process or where it serves the interest of justice.

What is Section 528 BNSS?

Section 528 of BNSS grants High Courts the authority to quash FIRs and criminal proceedings if they believe that the case does not merit further legal action. The court exercises this power primarily to prevent misuse of legal processes, harassment of individuals, or unnecessary prolongation of litigation. This section ensures that judicial discretion is applied in a way that serves the ends of justice while also maintaining balance in the criminal justice system.

Courts have often quashed FIRs when the complainant and the accused have reached a compromise in cases involving personal disputes, particularly in non-serious criminal offenses. However, whether such FIR quashing can be partial, applying only to some of the accused while the case continues against others, is an issue that remains unresolved.

Supreme Court’s Consideration

Recognizing the conflicting judgments across various High Courts, the Supreme Court has agreed to examine the legality of FIR quashing based on partial settlements. The case involves the accused, Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar, who sought relief on the grounds of a compromise with the complainant while the case continued against the remaining accused.

Punit Kumar @Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others

In this case, Puneet Kumar, one of the accused, filed a petition seeking FIR quashing against him on the basis of a compromise reached with the complainant. However, other accused individuals in the case had not entered into a similar compromise. The petitioner argued that since the dispute had been settled as far as he was concerned, the FIR against him should be quashed, even if proceedings continued against the others.

The Supreme Court, acknowledging the conflicting precedents on this issue, issued a notice and kept the proceedings against the petitioner in abeyance while allowing the trial to proceed against the remaining accused. The final ruling in this case will determine whether FIR quashing can be selectively applied for certain individuals while remaining in effect for others.

Conflicting High Court Judgments

Several High Courts have taken divergent views on this issue:

  1. Some High Courts have held that FIRs can only be quashed in their entirety—once registered, an FIR cannot be selectively annulled for certain individuals unless the case as a whole is compromised.
  2. Other High Courts have allowed partial FIR quashing—especially when the settlement involves personal disputes, minor offenses, or when the accused seeking relief played a minimal role in the alleged crime.

This legal uncertainty has led to inconsistent rulings across different jurisdictions, making the Supreme Court’s judgment on this matter highly anticipated.

Impact on the Legal System

If the Supreme Court allows partial FIR quashing, it could:

  • Reduce the burden on courts by allowing settlements for some accused, expediting the resolution process.
  • Ensure fairness by differentiating between degrees of involvement among accused persons in a crime.
  • Set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, bringing uniformity to judicial decisions.
  • Potentially raise concerns about the misuse of such compromises, particularly in cases involving undue influence or coercion.

Conversely, if the court rules against FIR quashing, it would reinforce the principle that FIRs must be quashed entirely or not at all, ensuring that justice follows a uniform and structured path.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others is set to clarify an important aspect of Indian criminal law. If the court permits FIR quashing partially, it could serve as a major step in streamlining criminal justice, reducing pendency, and allowing minor players in a case to seek relief without affecting proceedings against others.

With the Supreme Court expected to issue its ruling in the coming months, all eyes are on this judgment, which will shape how FIR quashing impacts ongoing criminal proceedings.

Stay tuned for further updates on this landmark case!


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)