Legal Associate – U.S. Law Projects | SKJ Juris Hiring in Pune | Legal Jobs 2025

⚪️ Early data · 0
Too early to tell 0 reports
⚖️ Know if this firm actually replies before applying

SKJ Juris Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered legal process outsourcing (LPO) company, based in New Jersey with a delivery center in Pune, India. The firm specializes in providing litigation support, immigration assistance, and lease abstraction services to U.S.-based clients, combining high-quality legal work with efficiency, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness.

Since its inception, SKJ Juris has built a strong reputation for excellence in cross-border legal services, offering tailored support to law firms, corporate legal departments, and solo practitioners across the United States. Its core strength lies in leveraging legal expertise, technology, and streamlined processes to deliver precise, client-focused solutions.


Location:

Pune, Maharashtra (On-site)


Position / Vacancies:

  • Position: Legal Associate – U.S. Law Projects
  • Vacancies: Multiple (expansion underway)

Role Overview:

SKJ Juris is inviting applications from law graduates eager to explore international legal work and gain hands-on experience in U.S. law–related assignments. The firm’s Pune delivery center plays a key role in executing client projects in areas such as litigation support, contract management, immigration law, and real estate documentation.

The position is ideal for analytical and detail-oriented professionals who wish to develop global legal exposure and advance their careers in the fast-evolving legal process outsourcing sector.


Eligibility Criteria:

To qualify for the Legal Associate role at SKJ Juris, applicants should meet the following requirements:

  • Educational Qualification: Bachelor’s degree in Law (LL.B.) from a recognized university.
  • Strong research, drafting, and analytical abilities.
  • Excellent written and verbal communication skills in English.
  • Ability to interpret and analyze complex legal documents.
  • Proficiency in using legal databases and Microsoft Office tools.
  • Interest in U.S. law, international legal systems, and cross-border legal operations.
  • Prior experience in LPOs, KPOs, or international legal projects is desirable but not mandatory.
  • A proactive attitude, strong time management, and the ability to meet deadlines under pressure.

Key Responsibilities:

As a Legal Associate at SKJ Juris, you will contribute to the delivery of high-quality legal services and support across multiple practice areas, including litigation, immigration, and corporate law.

Your key responsibilities will include:

  1. Legal Research and Analysis
    • Conduct detailed legal research on U.S. statutes, case laws, and regulatory frameworks.
    • Prepare research memos and summaries that assist attorneys in decision-making and case strategy.
  2. Document Review and Drafting
    • Analyze pleadings, discovery materials, and evidence in litigation matters.
    • Draft clear and concise legal documents, including contracts, briefs, and reports.
    • Prepare structured summaries of complex agreements for lease abstraction and real estate transactions.
  3. Litigation and Immigration Support
    • Assist in preparation of immigration petitions, case files, and client documentation for submission to U.S. authorities.
    • Support litigation teams with e-discovery, document management, and factual analysis.
  4. Cross-Functional Collaboration
    • Work closely with project leads, attorneys, and team members to ensure accuracy and adherence to project timelines.
    • Coordinate with clients and internal teams to ensure smooth delivery of work aligned with client expectations.
  5. Quality Assurance and Process Adherence
    • Maintain strict confidentiality and compliance with data protection standards.
    • Follow internal process guidelines, workflow systems, and quality control protocols for every project.

What You’ll Gain:

Joining SKJ Juris as a Legal Associate offers exposure to international legal operations and an opportunity to enhance your professional and analytical skills in a global environment.

Key benefits include:

  • International Exposure: Gain practical experience in U.S. legal systems through direct involvement in cross-border projects.
  • Skill Development: Build expertise in litigation support, immigration law, and real estate legal processes.
  • Professional Growth: Learn to apply legal principles in a corporate and client-driven environment.
  • Mentorship: Work under experienced legal professionals who guide associates on best practices in research, drafting, and client communication.
  • Structured Learning Environment: Develop a strong understanding of how global LPOs operate within the international legal services industry.

This role also offers an excellent foundation for professionals aiming to pursue long-term careers in corporate law, international legal management, or U.S.-based legal support services.


Duration / Employment Type:

Full-Time (Permanent Role)


Salary:

Not disclosed; competitive and commensurate with qualifications and experience.


Ideal Candidate Profile:

The position is best suited for recent law graduates or early-career professionals who are:

  • Highly organized, detail-oriented, and adaptable.
  • Interested in technology-enabled legal work and cross-border collaboration.
  • Capable of handling multiple projects and deadlines with precision.
  • Willing to work in a fast-paced, performance-driven environment that values accuracy and efficiency.

Work Culture at SKJ Juris:

At SKJ Juris, teamwork, integrity, and professionalism form the foundation of the company’s culture. The firm promotes a collaborative and merit-based environment where associates can learn continuously and grow with the organization.

The Pune office encourages open communication, skill sharing, and performance recognition. Associates are exposed to global best practices in legal delivery, client service, and project management — preparing them for leadership roles in the LPO sector.


Last Date to Apply:

Not specified — applications are reviewed on a rolling basis. Early applications are encouraged, as hiring is currently active.


How to Apply:

Interested candidates should send their updated resume to:
hr@skjjuris.com

Applicants are encouraged to include a short cover letter highlighting relevant skills, interest in U.S. law, and any previous LPO or international legal experience.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Sedition in Media Law: Impact on Press Freedom, Key Cases, and Legal Reform

Sedition in Media Law has become one of the most debated legal issues in India, especially concerning press freedom and digital journalism.

Introduction

Media is known as the “fourth pillar” of Indian democracy. The media’s job is to put forward the information collected by them to the public, question authority, and hold people who are in power, accountable. But when the law of sedition is applied to the media, it raises a serious concern: Is the law being used to protect the nation or to silence the press?

This blog explores how sedition interacts with media law in India, how courts have interpreted it, how it’s applied to journalists and why it has become controversial in recent years.

Sedition is defined in Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It punishes anyone who, by words (spoken or written), any kinds of signs, or visual representations, brings or tries to bring hatred, contempt, or disaffection towards the government.

This offence is cognizable and non-bailable, with punishment ranging from three years to life imprisonment.

How Does Sedition Affect the Media?

In media law, sedition becomes a concern when journalists, editors, news platforms, or digital creators are accused of threatening public order simply for publishing news, or critical commentary by showing their personal opinions.

While the media is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution (freedom of speech and expression), this right is subject to reasonable restrictions. One such restriction is “security of the State” which is where sedition comes into play.

But here’s the problem: the line between criticism and sedition is often blurred, especially when powerful institutions feel challenged.

Key Legal Case:

Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962)

This is a landmark Supreme Court case that saved sedition law from being struck down but limited its use.

The Court held that criticising the government is not sedition unless it incites violence or creates public disorder. So, reporting, opinion pieces, satire, or even strong words are not seditious unless they lead to real harm or threats to the State.

Yet, in practice, media persons are often arrested or harassed under sedition law without any real proof of violence or incitement.

Recent Cases Involving Media and Sedition

  1. Vinod Dua Case (2021): A senior journalist was charged with sedition for criticizing the government’s handling of COVID-19. The Supreme Court later quashed the FIR, saying that criticism of the government does not amount to sedition.
  2. Arrest of Siddique Kappan (2020): A journalist was arrested on his way to report on the Hathras rape case and was charged under sedition and UAPA. The State claimed he was spreading communal tension.
  3. Assam Journalist Kishorchandra Wangkhem: He was repeatedly jailed for criticizing the government on Facebook, including sedition charges.

These cases show how sedition law is often used to suppress uncomfortable journalism, even when there is no threat to public order.

Sedition in Digital Media

With the rise of digital journalism, social media posts, YouTube channels, and online platforms are new targets. A simple tweet, meme, or video criticizing the government or any other power-holding authority can lead to sedition charges, even if there is no violent intent.

The law hasn’t kept up with the nature of digital speech, where expression is faster, and more public even if it’s not always dangerous.

Legal Criticism of Sedition in Media

  1. Vague and Overbroad: Terms like “disaffection” are too broad. A news report that angers the government could be seen as sedition, even if it’s factually correct.
  2. Low Conviction, High Harassment: Conviction rates under Section 124A are very low. But once sedition is charged, the process becomes the punishment—with long legal battles, jail time, and media censorship.
  3. Chilling Effect: Even the fear of sedition stops many journalists from reporting boldly. This weakens press freedom and harms democratic debate.

Laws That Overlap with Sedition

Apart from sedition, there are other laws that affect the media:

  • Official Secrets Act: Used to stop leaks of government documents.
  • Defamation Laws: Used to sue or arrest journalists for reports on public figures.
  • UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act): A much harsher law, often used along with sedition.

All of these together can make investigative journalism risky, especially in areas like national security, corruption, or protests.

Recommendations for Reform

  1. Repeal or Replace Section 124A: Many legal experts and even the Law Commission have recommended removing sedition law or narrowing its scope.
  2. Strict Guidelines for Use: Like the Supreme Court’s guidelines in the Vinod Dua case, sedition should only apply when there is clear evidence of incitement to violence.
  3. Media Protections: Journalists doing their duty should be protected, not punished. Their reporting—even if critical—should be shielded from sedition unless it causes actual harm.
  4. Training Law Enforcement: Police should be trained to understand the difference between journalism and anti-national activity. Misuse often begins with misinterpretation.

Global View: How Other Democracies See Sedition

  • United Kingdom: Repealed sedition in 2009.
  • Australia: Replaced sedition with “advocating terrorism” in 2010, with stricter definitions.
  • United States: Strong protections under the First Amendment. Sedition charges are almost never used.

India is one of the few democracies where sedition is still frequently applied, especially against the press.

Conclusion

Sedition law, as it stands, does not belong in a modern media landscape. In a democracy, the government must be open to criticism—even harsh criticism—from the press. Journalism is not a crime. Holding the government accountable is not sedition.

Section 124A, when used against the media, acts more as a tool of intimidation than a protection of national security. It’s time for India to re-examine this outdated law and move toward a legal system that respects press freedom and supports a fearless, independent media.


Rupsha Ahmed ( Department of Law, University of Calcutta – 2nd Year )

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)