Why Consulting a Lawyer for Wills Is Very Important for Proper Estate Planning

Estate planning is not only for wealthy or elderly people, but something every responsible person must undertake. A properly prepared plan will ensure your property goes where you want it to go and your loved ones are well protected. But doing it yourself subjects you to legal issues, confusion, or conflict. Consulting a Lawyer for Wills is a smart and essential move.

What is a Will and Why Does it Matter?

A will is a statement that describes how your money, belongings, and property will be distributed after you pass away. It also enables you to name guardians for your children, choose an executor to manage your estate, and make any special wishes.

Maintaining a legally valid and clear will ensures:

  • Your home is safe with us.
  • Your family avoids unnecessary legal issues. 
  • Misunderstandings and conflicts are reduced.
  • Your minor children are safe and protected.

The Risks of Writing a Will Yourself

Most people try to write their wills using online forms or copying from the web. It is a cost-saving and simple way, but it has several risks:

1. Legal Validity Issues

Wills must comply with certain legal requirements if they are to be valid. Your will may be challenged or even declared invalid if it does not meet local law.

2. Ambiguities in Language

Unclear instructions or wrong phrasing may lead to confusion and misunderstanding. A precise legal language used by an Attorney for Wills is free from such problems.

3. Missing Key Clauses

A DIY will can lack essential clauses such as residuary clauses, revocation of earlier wills, or distribution based on stated assets, which can lead to problems in the future.

4. Family Conflicts

Incorrect or legally suspect wills often lead to family conflicts. A professional will prevent these risks by making their desires clear.

The role of a Wills Lawyer in Estate Planning

Employing a Lawyer for Wills does more than producing a document. Their advice makes your estate plan legal, tailored to your needs, and functional.

1. Right Asset Allocation

A lawyer helps you list all your assets—movable and immovable—and ensures proper distribution to avoid future claims or confusion.

2. Legal Language and Tax Implications

Estate planning involves words like probate, executors, guardianship, etc. A lawyer clarifies all these and helps you plan in such a way that reduces the tax burden.

3. Safeguarding Vulnerable Beneficiaries

If you have children, elderly parents, or differently-abled dependents, a lawyer helps you plan their financial security legally and correctly.

4. Changing the Will When Required

Your situation can change—marriage, kids, getting new properties, etc. A lawyer for wills helps you revise and update the will as situations require better match your current situation.

When to Talk to a Lawyer About Wills?

While it’s never too early, some life situations force one to consult with an attorney:

  • After marriage or divorce
  • Concept of a child
  • Purchase of property or valuable assets
  • Starting a business
  • Aging or health problems

Even if you already have a will, having it updated by an attorney ensures that it is valid and reflects your current wishes.

Myths Surrounding Employing a Lawyer to Make Wills

Let’s clear some myths that stop people from availing the services of experts:

1. “I Don’t Own Much”

Even if you have little property, a will ensures that they are transferred to the right people without involving the courts.

2. “Lawyers Are Expensive”

Several lawyers offer affordable will-writing packages. Not having a valid will can cost many times more in legal costs and disputes.

3. “I Can Do It Online”

Online templates cannot address unique personal or legal circumstances. An individualized recommendation that no template can give is provided by A Lawyer for Wills.

Role of a Will Lawyer in Preventing Probate Delays

Probate is a court procedure of validating a will and distributing property. A poorly drafted will can make this time-consuming and expensive. An attorney ensures that:

  • The will is crafted to simplify probate.
  • There are witnesses and signatures in place.
  • Executors are duly nominated.

This reduces downtime and provides faster access to assets by your family.

Final Thoughts

Estate planning is not so much about money—it’s about peace of mind, family unity, and leaving a clear path. Working with a Lawyer for Wills gives you the peace of mind that your wishes will be followed and your loved ones will be cared for properly. 

Don’t wait for the “right time.” The right time is always now. Regardless of whether your estate is great or small, ensure that your will is legally satisfactory and appropriate to your situation by way of professional guidance. 

If you are considering writing or amending your will, you can go ahead and look for such qualified professionals as a Lawyer for Wills who will assist in simplifying the details for you in easy and understandable language.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

NUJS National Disability Law Moot 2025 – India’s 1st Moot on Disability Rights

NUJS National Disability Law Moot 2025 – A Historic Step Toward Inclusive Legal Advocacy

The NUJS National Disability Law Moot 2025 is India’s first national-level moot court competition dedicated solely to the legal rights of persons with disabilities (PwDs). Organized by the prestigious West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (WBNUJS), Kolkata, this competition sets a new precedent in legal education by focusing exclusively on disability law.

With a history of hosting top-tier events such as the NUJS-HSF Moot, ADR Mediation Competition, and Para-Invicta, NUJS continues its tradition of promoting inclusivity and justice with this pioneering initiative.

What Is the NUJS National Disability Law Moot 2025 About?

This moot is designed to:

  • Encourage legal scholarship in disability law
  • Highlight critical themes like workplace discrimination, inclusive education, and accessibility
  • Create a national platform for future legal professionals to explore and argue real-world issues under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

The competition includes:

  • Memorial Qualification Round
  • Offline Oral Rounds at the WBNUJS campus in Kolkata
  • Researcher’s Test for qualifying teams

Key Dates and Deadlines

EventDate
Registration OpensMay 30, 2025
Clarification DeadlineJune 25, 2025
Registration ClosesJune 30, 2025
Memorial SubmissionJuly 12, 2025
Oral Round ShortlistJuly 21, 2025
Oral Rounds at WBNUJSAugust 21–24, 2025

Eligibility & Team Composition

  • Open to undergraduate law students in any Indian university
  • 2 to 3 members per team
  • Cross-college teams allowed
  • No cap on the number of teams per institution
  • Postgraduate students are not eligible

Awards & Recognition

The NUJS National Disability Law Moot 2025 offers extensive awards, including:

  • Winning, Runners-Up & Second Runners-Up Teams
  • Best Advocate (Prelims and Overall)
  • Best Memorials (Petitioner & Respondent)
  • Best Researcher & Runner-Up
  • Certificates for Semi- and Quarter-Finalists
  • Participation certificates for all teams

Registration Fees & Optional Accommodation

  • Memo Round Fee: ₹2,500/team
    • ₹2,100 for teams with at least one PwD participant
  • Oral Round Fee (for shortlisted teams): ₹2,000
  • Accommodation (optional): ₹5,500/team (August 21–24)

Payment Details:

  • Account Name: Student Juridical Association
  • Account No: 520101246976299
  • IFSC Code: UBIN0906638
  • Bank: Union Bank, NUJS Branch, Salt Lake, Kolkata

Registration Process

  1. Fill the official Google Form: https://forms.gle/sZHKXriWTy4EEfGL8
  2. Email the following to nationaldisabilitymoot@nujs.edu:
    • Names, Years, and Institutions of team members
    • College ID Cards
    • Payment screenshot

Contact Details

  • Email: nationaldisabilitymoot@nujs.edu
  • Chair: Kinjal Das – +91 75959 65675
  • Deputy Chairs:
    • Anushka Maji – +91 86174 78308
    • Saarthak Samadder – +91 94330 48880
  • Board of Directors:
    • Ritika Amlajiya – +91 80943 45186
    • Shubhankar Singha – +91 96797 30493

Final Words

The NUJS National Disability Law Moot 2025 is not just another moot—it’s a platform for change. By promoting awareness of the challenges faced by PwDs through legal debate, WBNUJS is nurturing future lawyers who will lead the way in accessibility and justice.

Don’t miss this opportunity to be part of history. Register today and join us in Kolkata for a groundbreaking legal experience.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Sedition in Media Law: Impact on Press Freedom, Key Cases, and Legal Reform

Sedition in Media Law has become one of the most debated legal issues in India, especially concerning press freedom and digital journalism.

Introduction

Media is known as the “fourth pillar” of Indian democracy. The media’s job is to put forward the information collected by them to the public, question authority, and hold people who are in power, accountable. But when the law of sedition is applied to the media, it raises a serious concern: Is the law being used to protect the nation or to silence the press?

This blog explores how sedition interacts with media law in India, how courts have interpreted it, how it’s applied to journalists and why it has become controversial in recent years.

Sedition is defined in Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It punishes anyone who, by words (spoken or written), any kinds of signs, or visual representations, brings or tries to bring hatred, contempt, or disaffection towards the government.

This offence is cognizable and non-bailable, with punishment ranging from three years to life imprisonment.

How Does Sedition Affect the Media?

In media law, sedition becomes a concern when journalists, editors, news platforms, or digital creators are accused of threatening public order simply for publishing news, or critical commentary by showing their personal opinions.

While the media is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution (freedom of speech and expression), this right is subject to reasonable restrictions. One such restriction is “security of the State” which is where sedition comes into play.

But here’s the problem: the line between criticism and sedition is often blurred, especially when powerful institutions feel challenged.

Key Legal Case:

Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962)

This is a landmark Supreme Court case that saved sedition law from being struck down but limited its use.

The Court held that criticising the government is not sedition unless it incites violence or creates public disorder. So, reporting, opinion pieces, satire, or even strong words are not seditious unless they lead to real harm or threats to the State.

Yet, in practice, media persons are often arrested or harassed under sedition law without any real proof of violence or incitement.

Recent Cases Involving Media and Sedition

  1. Vinod Dua Case (2021): A senior journalist was charged with sedition for criticizing the government’s handling of COVID-19. The Supreme Court later quashed the FIR, saying that criticism of the government does not amount to sedition.
  2. Arrest of Siddique Kappan (2020): A journalist was arrested on his way to report on the Hathras rape case and was charged under sedition and UAPA. The State claimed he was spreading communal tension.
  3. Assam Journalist Kishorchandra Wangkhem: He was repeatedly jailed for criticizing the government on Facebook, including sedition charges.

These cases show how sedition law is often used to suppress uncomfortable journalism, even when there is no threat to public order.

Sedition in Digital Media

With the rise of digital journalism, social media posts, YouTube channels, and online platforms are new targets. A simple tweet, meme, or video criticizing the government or any other power-holding authority can lead to sedition charges, even if there is no violent intent.

The law hasn’t kept up with the nature of digital speech, where expression is faster, and more public even if it’s not always dangerous.

Legal Criticism of Sedition in Media

  1. Vague and Overbroad: Terms like “disaffection” are too broad. A news report that angers the government could be seen as sedition, even if it’s factually correct.
  2. Low Conviction, High Harassment: Conviction rates under Section 124A are very low. But once sedition is charged, the process becomes the punishment—with long legal battles, jail time, and media censorship.
  3. Chilling Effect: Even the fear of sedition stops many journalists from reporting boldly. This weakens press freedom and harms democratic debate.

Laws That Overlap with Sedition

Apart from sedition, there are other laws that affect the media:

  • Official Secrets Act: Used to stop leaks of government documents.
  • Defamation Laws: Used to sue or arrest journalists for reports on public figures.
  • UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act): A much harsher law, often used along with sedition.

All of these together can make investigative journalism risky, especially in areas like national security, corruption, or protests.

Recommendations for Reform

  1. Repeal or Replace Section 124A: Many legal experts and even the Law Commission have recommended removing sedition law or narrowing its scope.
  2. Strict Guidelines for Use: Like the Supreme Court’s guidelines in the Vinod Dua case, sedition should only apply when there is clear evidence of incitement to violence.
  3. Media Protections: Journalists doing their duty should be protected, not punished. Their reporting—even if critical—should be shielded from sedition unless it causes actual harm.
  4. Training Law Enforcement: Police should be trained to understand the difference between journalism and anti-national activity. Misuse often begins with misinterpretation.

Global View: How Other Democracies See Sedition

  • United Kingdom: Repealed sedition in 2009.
  • Australia: Replaced sedition with “advocating terrorism” in 2010, with stricter definitions.
  • United States: Strong protections under the First Amendment. Sedition charges are almost never used.

India is one of the few democracies where sedition is still frequently applied, especially against the press.

Conclusion

Sedition law, as it stands, does not belong in a modern media landscape. In a democracy, the government must be open to criticism—even harsh criticism—from the press. Journalism is not a crime. Holding the government accountable is not sedition.

Section 124A, when used against the media, acts more as a tool of intimidation than a protection of national security. It’s time for India to re-examine this outdated law and move toward a legal system that respects press freedom and supports a fearless, independent media.


Rupsha Ahmed ( Department of Law, University of Calcutta – 2nd Year )

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)