Unjust Employment Practices under Labour Laws: Bargaining & Compliance Guide

Introduction 

Unjust Employment Practices under Labour Laws have become a growing concern in modern workplaces, especially with the rise of gig work, contract labour, and informal sector jobs. These practices not only violate statutory protections but also weaken the integrity of industrial relations. Alongside, the role of bargaining, especially collective bargaining, plays a vital part in safeguarding worker rights and ensuring compliance with India’s labour legislation. This article explores both these elements and their legal implications.

By giving employees the ability to legally and systematically defend their rights, collective bargaining helps to prevent possible exploitation and makes sure that employers don’t arbitrarily set terms of employment. 

Concept of Collective Bargaining

The legal framework for collective bargaining in India is mainly regulated by various labour laws and industrial relations statutes. 

These regulations manage the relationship between employers, employees, and trade unions, ensuring that the collective bargaining process is adjudicated fairly, remains transparent, and with legal safeguards.

  1. The Trade Unions Act, 1926 
  2. The Payment of Wages Act, 1936
  3. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948
  4. The Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Trade Unions Act, 1926 

The Trade Unions Act governs the formation, registration, and entitlements of trade unions in India. Through this Act, unions obtain legal acknowledgement, which is essential for collective Bargaining. 

The Payment of Wages Act, 1936

The Payment of Wages Act guarantees that employees receive fair and timely compensation. It forms the basis for collective bargaining concerning wage and salary-related topics. 

The Minimum Wages Act, 1948

The Minimum Wages Act represents a vital statute for collective bargaining as it guarantees that workers are paid at least the minimum wage for their labour. 

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Industrial Relations Code (part of India’s labour law reforms) amalgamates and updates former laws, including the Industrial Disputes Act. 

Legal protection for collective bargaining 

In India, a number of laws safeguard the fundamental right to collective bargaining and organization. 

Through the protection of fundamental freedoms necessary for collective action, such as the ability to organize associations, which is crucial to trade union activities, the Indian Constitution indirectly secures these rights.

  • The 1926 Trade Unions Act
  • The Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The 1926 Trade Unions Act

The right of workers to organize trade unions is acknowledged by this Act. It enables workers to legally represent themselves in collective bargaining by registering their unions. 

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Code combines clauses pertaining to collective bargaining, trade unions, and labour disputes. It encourages employee involvement in decision-making processes and requires union recognition in specific companies. 

To guarantee that workers have a formal voice in the negotiation process, the Code, for instance, mandates that unions that represent a sizable number of employees be recognized for collective bargaining.

Unfair Labour Practices (ULP) 

In India, Actions taken by employers, trade unions, or employees that go against the fundamentals of reasonable and fair labour relations are referred to as unfair labour practices (ULPs).

In order to safeguard workers’ rights and preserve industrial harmony, these behaviours are expressly forbidden by Indian labour regulations. The legal foundation for recognizing and resolving ULPs is established by the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 and the Industrial Relations Code of 2020.

In the workplace, both employers and employees are held to high standards, and breaking these norms can have legal repercussions.

ULPs frequently take the form of discriminatory actions directed at union members.

  1. Suspension or Termination
  2. Benefit Denial
  3. Harassment or Intimidation

Suspension or Termination

Employees may be unlawfully suspended or terminated by their employers due to their participation in union activities or union membership. This is an unfair labour practice and a violation of workers’ rights.

Benefit Denial

Just because a worker is a union member does not mean that their employer can refuse them promotions, bonuses, or other benefits.

Harassment or Intimidation

Employers may use tactics to harass or threaten union members, particularly those participating in collective bargaining or leadership positions. Workers’ rights to freely associate and organize are violated, and a hostile climate is created for union activity.

Legal consequences of unfair labour practices

Unfair labour practices (ULPs) are grave transgressions of employee rights and industrial relations standards in India. The law requires trade unions and employers to refrain from actions that jeopardize workers’ rights or disturb workplace harmony.

There are legal repercussions for ULPs, such as the enforcement of collective bargaining agreements, damages for impacted workers, and sanctions for unions or businesses involved in the activity. 

Conclusion

For workers, companies, and governments around the world, the confluence of globalization, collective bargaining, and labour legislation offers both opportunities and difficulties. Even though globalization has linked markets and boosted economic progress, it has also made workers more vulnerable, especially in poorer nations where transnational companies (TNCs) frequently have substantial influence over working conditions. 

Since workers must increasingly defend their rights in a globalized society, the emergence of global supply chains and cross-border negotiating has complicated collective agreements while also making them more important.



RIMI AGARWAL
 (Manipal University Jaipur – 3rd Year )

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Retribution vs Reformation: Balancing Justice in Modern Criminal Law

INTRODUCTION –

Punishment is a fundamental objective of criminal law, with a goal to deter criminals from committing more crimes, in addition to providing justice to the victims. Punishments play an important role in ensuring societal well-being, in addition to replenishing the faith of the society in the legal system.
But, should the wrongdoer be given an opportunity to reform and re-enter the society as a better individual, or should they be punished harshly, that is a fundamental question. This question has been the matter of a long ongoing debate in the current legal scenario.
While the retributive approach aims at severe and harsh punishment to the victim, reformative approach advocates for opportunities that help rehabilitate offenders through relevant initiatives such as vocational training or therapy sessions.


RETRIBUTIVE APPROACH –

This approach works on the ‘Eye for an Eye’ model, where punishment is of the same intensity as of the crime, and that the offender must feel the same amount of suffering as felt by the victim.
This approach works on various principles, such as Principle of Responsibility (A Person may only be punished if he/she has voluntarily done something wrong), Principle of Proportionality (The punishment to an offence should either be equivalent to or match the intensity of the crime), and Principle of Just Requital (Victims should see the wrongdoer getting punished).
This approach can be considered as being victim centric, as it takes into account the pain and agony of the victims in deciding the punishment. Additionally, victims also tend to call for harsher punishments to the offenders for adequate discharge of justice and to ensure an appropriate closure. Also, grievous crimes such as the Nirbhaya Rape Case result in mass public outrage and render it necessary for the offenders to be given an adequate punishment for setting up a suitable precedent for future offenders.


INDIAN CONTEXT –

While India has seen a shift towards more of a Preventive or Reformative Approach, glimpses of the retributive approach can still be seen in various landmark cases, where the penalty is proportionate to the severity of the crime. Indian courts, while sentencing consider both the crime and the criminal, which aligns with the Retributive Approach.
For example, the tragic Delhi Rape Case (Nirbhaya, 2012) is a great example of application of the Retributive Approach, where, by the decision of the Supreme Court, 4 out of the 6 convicts were given death penalty, which is only given in the rarest of rare cases.


REFORMATIVE APPROACH –

In the words of Mahatma Gandhi – ‘Punish the Sin, Not the Sinner’
This approach differs fundamentally from the retributive approach, aiming towards rehabilitation and inclusivity for the offenders, by means of vocational trainings or skill development initiatives, which help them blend into the society and focus on re-building their life and livelihoods, addressing the objectives of both fairness to the victim as well as preserve the safety and security of the community.
Several initiatives, such as open prisons, prison education, vocational trainings etc. are seen to have shown a considerable improvement in such criminals. Additionally, the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, also advocates for reformative justice for minor offenders. Also, the recent inclusion of community service as a punitive measure under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 is a landmark step forward with respect to this approach, where, under Section 4(f), the court may mandate community service as punishment for offenders, wherein they perform tasks that benefit the community without compensation.


INDIAN CONTEXT –

The Indian Constitution, by virtue of articles 72 and 161 authorise the president to pardon a wrongdoer, Section 54, IPC allows for commutation of death penalty into life imprisonment, the Probation of Offenders Act allows for discharge of a wrongdoer on account of good behaviour, and provisions such as Probation and Parole align with the principles of Reformative Approach.


RETRIBUTION VS REFORMATION – THE CONFLICT

While both the approaches work on their respective models, which ultimately aim for fair and just legal decisions, the conflict arises in their application. The retributive approach advocates harshness and severity of punishments, overlooking the perspective of the offender, and the adverse effects that such severe punishments can have on the lives of the individual. Long term prison sentences and large capital punishments may negatively affect the personal, social and professional lives of the individual.
However, there are two facets of every coin, and these approaches are no exception. While the Reformative Approach is in stark contrast to the Retributive Approach and advocates for leniency, the conflict still persists.
Leniency may not always work in case of crimes, especially the ones related to heinous offences such as sexual offences or women centric crimes. On the contrary, leniency in such cases may even promote such offenders, as fear of punishment may decrease, especially in the case of hardened criminals.
So, the question persists – which approach is better suited in the long run?


CONCLUSION – THE WAY FORWARD

The answer lies in the adoption of a mixed-model approach – where the positive aspects of both the approaches are simultaneously adopted to cater to the rights of both the victim and the offender. An example of this approach can be the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, allowing for discharge on account of good behaviour (Section – 4) (Reformation), but it is not applicable to conviction of such offences, the penalty for which is death or life imprisonment (Retribution).
Such an approach ensures that the punishment is neither too harsh for the offender to suffer nor too lenient for the victim and the crime to be forgotten or overlooked.


REFERENCES –

blog[dot]ipleaders[dot]in/reformative-theory-of-punishment/

www[dot]legalserviceindia[dot]com/legal/article-17100-analysing-community-service-as-a-mode-of-punishment-in-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-bns-2023.html

blog[dot]ipleaders[dot]in/theories-of-punishment-a-thorough-study/

www[dot]manupatra[dot]com/roundup/334/Articles/An%20eye%20for%20an%20eye%20will%20make%20the%20whole%20world%20blind.pdf


Himani Bhatnagar
3rd Year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) Student
SVKM’s NMIMS, Indore

• Passionate about criminal law, justice reform, and legal academia.
• Contributor at Law Drishti | Research Writer

• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/himani-bhatnagar-a26826301/

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)