All contracts are agreements but all agreements are not contract ?

Introduction:

According to section 2(h) of The Indian Contract Act 1872 “An agreement
enforceable by law is a contract”. It means those agreements are enforceable
by law they are contracts others not. For example, an agreement to sell a bike
may be a contract, but an agreement to go to the movie may be a mere
agreement not enforceable by law. To go to a movie is a social agreement and
social agreements are not enforceable by law.

What is an agreement?

According to section 2(e) of The Indian Contract Act 1872 “Every promise and
every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other, is an
agreement”. We can understand this definition by an example, A promises to
deliver his book to B, and in return, B promises to pay 1,000 to A. There is said
to be an agreement between A and B.

All contracts are agreement

  • We know that when an agreement enforceable by law is a contract. A contract
    is an agreement that is enforceable by law. It is an agreement or set of
    promises giving rise to obligations that can be enforced or are recognized by
    law. In order to become an agreement into a contract, it has to satisfy all the
    essentials of a valid contract as mentioned in section 10 of the Indian Contract
    Act 1872.
  • Section 10 of this act says, “All agreements are contracts if they are made by
    the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration
    and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void”.

The essentials of a valid contract:

  1. There must be two parties.
  2. The agreement should be between the parties who are competent to
    contract.
  3. There should be a lawful consideration.
  4. The object of the agreement must be lawful.
  5. There should be free consent between the parties.
  6. The agreement must not be one that has been expressly declared to
    be void.

All agreements are not contracts

  • An agreement is a set of promises. Section 2(e) of The Indian Contract Act
    1872 says, “Every promise and every set of promises, forming the
    consideration for each other, is an agreement”. In an agreement, there is a
    promise between both parties. For example, A promises to deliver his book
    to B, and in return of B promises to pay Rs. 1,000 to A. there is said to be an
    agreement between A and B. After acceptance of the offer/proposal it
    becomes a promise, promise is the result of offer acceptance.
  • Thus, when there is a proposal/offer from the proposer and the acceptance of
    that proposal by the propose it results in a promise. Promise and reciprocal
    promise from promisor and promisee form an agreement.
  • Hence, we can conclude only commercial agreements where parties are
    intending to shoulder responsibility upon each other and when they are
    entering into an agreement keeping in mind that in case of breach of
    agreement terms by one of the parties, the aggrieved party may go to court
    against the party who breaches the terms and compel him by the process of
    law to pay compensation as decided.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Exercise of Article 226 power must be backed by prima facie material

In the matter of Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council Secretariat vs Respondent Nos. 1–3, the Supreme Court on 17 October 2025 set aside the Allahabad High Court’s direction referring a recruitment-related controversy to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), holding that such extraordinary power under Article 226 must be exercised only in exceptional cases backed by prima facie material and not on mere suspicion or general allegations of unfairness.

A Bench of Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi dealt with the challenge to the High Court’s order which, while hearing a special appeal arising out of recruitment disputes for Class-III posts in the U.P. Legislative Council, converted the case into a Suo motu Public Interest Litigation and directed a CBI preliminary inquiry into alleged manipulation and favoritism in the 2020 selection process.

The Supreme Court clarified that while High Courts possess wide constitutional powers under Articles 32 and 226, directions for CBI investigation cannot be issued routinely, vaguely, or in absence of specific pleadings or evidence. Referring to precedents such as Secretary, Minor Irrigation & Rural Engg. Services, U.P. v. Sahngoo Ram Arya (2002) 5 SCC 521; State of W.B. v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights (2010) 3 SCC 571; and Shree Shree Ram Janki Asthan Tapovan Mandir v. State of Jharkhand (2019) 6 SCC 25, the Court reiterated that a CBI probe must only be ordered where the allegations are grave, have national or institutional ramifications, and the State machinery is demonstrably incapable of ensuring a fair investigation.

The Court found that neither the writ petitioners nor the appellants had sought a CBI investigation, and the High Court had acted on mere doubt and conjecture regarding the identification of private recruitment agencies. The petitioners themselves had admitted before the Supreme Court that they did not seek or support a CBI probe. Holding the High Court’s order to be “jurisdictionally excessive and procedurally irregular”, the Supreme Court observed that recruitment disputes do not automatically justify central investigation unless the irregularities “shake the conscience of the Court” or involve systemic corruption. The Bench cautioned that converting a “special appeal into a Suo motu” PIL and summoning CBI intervention “without foundational facts” undermines the principle of judicial self-restraint and violates the spirit of federalism.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)