Legal Associate – HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL)

Legal Associate – HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL) applications are now open for experienced legal professionals looking to work in one of India’s leading energy sector joint ventures. HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd., a collaboration between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and the Government of Rajasthan, is inviting candidates to apply for a full-time in-house legal position at its growing operations in Rajasthan.

HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL) was incorporated in 2013 with the goal of establishing a world-class refinery and petrochemical complex in the Barmer district of Rajasthan. As HRRL continues to expand its legal, contractual, and operational functions, it seeks a dynamic legal associate to join its team and contribute to the strategic and legal stability of the organization.

Key Responsibilities:

The Legal Associate – HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL) will play a vital role in managing a wide spectrum of legal activities and will be responsible for:

  • Drafting and finalizing pleadings, agreements, deeds, legal notices, and other required documents for litigation and non-litigation purposes.
  • Reviewing, negotiating, and finalizing contract terms and conditions in coordination with external parties, ensuring compliance and protection of company interests.
  • Managing and defending claims raised by contractors, including preparing responses and formulating legal arguments.
  • Developing legal strategies for both offensive and defensive litigation involving the company.
  • Providing timely legal opinions and advisory responses to internal departments on regulatory and contractual matters.
  • Briefing empanelled lawyers and attending court hearings or arbitrations as required.
  • Ensuring timely filing and submission of pleadings and affidavits within statutory limitation periods.
  • Conducting legal research on evolving case law, legislative developments, and compliance frameworks, and sharing updates with relevant teams.
  • Staying informed on legal trends and ensuring internal adherence to changes in legal requirements.
  • Assisting in arbitration proceedings, reviewing title documents, and contributing to in-house legal training or awareness programs.

Ideal Candidate Profile:

The Legal Associate – HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL) role is best suited for mid-level professionals who meet the following qualifications:

  • Bachelor’s degree in Law (LL.B.) – either a 3-year course after graduation or a 5-year integrated law degree after Class 12 – from an AICTE/UGC-recognized institution.
  • Minimum 60% aggregate marks in the qualifying degree (55% for SC/ST/PwBD categories).
  • At least 3 years of post-qualification experience in a legal role, whether in private legal practice, a law firm, or within a corporate legal department.
  • Strong skills in legal drafting, litigation management, negotiation, contract review, and corporate advisory functions.
  • Sound understanding of relevant legal domains including corporate law, arbitration, infrastructure contracts, and regulatory frameworks.
  • Ability to handle high-pressure legal work independently and in collaboration with cross-functional teams.

About the Company:

HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL) is a prestigious public-private joint venture focused on building a state-of-the-art refinery and petrochemical facility in Rajasthan. The company plays a critical role in boosting local economic growth and energy infrastructure in India’s western region. HRRL provides a structured, growth-oriented, and stable work environment where employees contribute to major infrastructure development while building deep legal and regulatory expertise.

Job Details at a Glance:

  • Position: Legal Associate
  • Company: HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL)
  • Location: Rajasthan (Exact location to be confirmed)
  • Job Type: Full-time, In-house legal role
  • Monthly Salary: ₹50,000 – ₹1,60,000 based on qualifications and experience

Important Dates:

  • Application Start Date: 11th July 2025
  • Application Deadline: 10th August 2025 (till 23:45 hrs IST)
  • Cut-off date for eligibility and experience: 11th July 2025

How to Apply:

Interested and eligible candidates must submit their application through the official portal:
https://lnkd.in/gXxg79mM

Applicants are advised to fill in accurate information and keep supporting documents ready (educational certificates, proof of experience, photo ID, etc.) for verification. Incomplete or incorrect applications may lead to disqualification.

Selection Process:

Shortlisted candidates will be notified regarding the next steps in the selection process. This may include a written test, document verification, and an interview round (in-person or virtual). The final selection will be based on overall merit, relevant experience, and HRRL’s internal recruitment guidelines.

Conclusion:

If you are a legal professional with a strong background in corporate law, contract negotiation, and litigation strategy, the Legal Associate – HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Ltd. (HRRL) position offers a unique chance to work with a major energy infrastructure company. Apply by 10th August 2025 to contribute to one of India’s most significant refinery projects while advancing your legal career in a challenging and rewarding environment.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

FIR Quashing: Can an FIR Be Partially Quashed? Supreme Court’s Bold Decision Awaited

Introduction

FIR quashing is a significant legal remedy in the Indian judicial system, allowing the High Court to dismiss an FIR under specific circumstances. The Supreme Court of India is set to examine a crucial legal question—whether an FIR can be partially quashed when a compromise is reached between the victims and only some of the accused. This issue, which has led to conflicting judgments across various High Courts, has now been taken up for scrutiny in the case of Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others. The verdict could significantly impact criminal justice procedures and the backlog of pending cases.

Legal Background

Under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the High Court has the inherent power for FIR quashing against an accused person. This power is typically exercised in cases where continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the judicial process or where it serves the interest of justice.

What is Section 528 BNSS?

Section 528 of BNSS grants High Courts the authority to quash FIRs and criminal proceedings if they believe that the case does not merit further legal action. The court exercises this power primarily to prevent misuse of legal processes, harassment of individuals, or unnecessary prolongation of litigation. This section ensures that judicial discretion is applied in a way that serves the ends of justice while also maintaining balance in the criminal justice system.

Courts have often quashed FIRs when the complainant and the accused have reached a compromise in cases involving personal disputes, particularly in non-serious criminal offenses. However, whether such FIR quashing can be partial, applying only to some of the accused while the case continues against others, is an issue that remains unresolved.

Supreme Court’s Consideration

Recognizing the conflicting judgments across various High Courts, the Supreme Court has agreed to examine the legality of FIR quashing based on partial settlements. The case involves the accused, Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar, who sought relief on the grounds of a compromise with the complainant while the case continued against the remaining accused.

Punit Kumar @Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others

In this case, Puneet Kumar, one of the accused, filed a petition seeking FIR quashing against him on the basis of a compromise reached with the complainant. However, other accused individuals in the case had not entered into a similar compromise. The petitioner argued that since the dispute had been settled as far as he was concerned, the FIR against him should be quashed, even if proceedings continued against the others.

The Supreme Court, acknowledging the conflicting precedents on this issue, issued a notice and kept the proceedings against the petitioner in abeyance while allowing the trial to proceed against the remaining accused. The final ruling in this case will determine whether FIR quashing can be selectively applied for certain individuals while remaining in effect for others.

Conflicting High Court Judgments

Several High Courts have taken divergent views on this issue:

  1. Some High Courts have held that FIRs can only be quashed in their entirety—once registered, an FIR cannot be selectively annulled for certain individuals unless the case as a whole is compromised.
  2. Other High Courts have allowed partial FIR quashing—especially when the settlement involves personal disputes, minor offenses, or when the accused seeking relief played a minimal role in the alleged crime.

This legal uncertainty has led to inconsistent rulings across different jurisdictions, making the Supreme Court’s judgment on this matter highly anticipated.

Impact on the Legal System

If the Supreme Court allows partial FIR quashing, it could:

  • Reduce the burden on courts by allowing settlements for some accused, expediting the resolution process.
  • Ensure fairness by differentiating between degrees of involvement among accused persons in a crime.
  • Set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, bringing uniformity to judicial decisions.
  • Potentially raise concerns about the misuse of such compromises, particularly in cases involving undue influence or coercion.

Conversely, if the court rules against FIR quashing, it would reinforce the principle that FIRs must be quashed entirely or not at all, ensuring that justice follows a uniform and structured path.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Puneet Kumar @ Punit Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others is set to clarify an important aspect of Indian criminal law. If the court permits FIR quashing partially, it could serve as a major step in streamlining criminal justice, reducing pendency, and allowing minor players in a case to seek relief without affecting proceedings against others.

With the Supreme Court expected to issue its ruling in the coming months, all eyes are on this judgment, which will shape how FIR quashing impacts ongoing criminal proceedings.

Stay tuned for further updates on this landmark case!


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)