Bihar Election Commission Challenge by PUCL, Yogendra Yadav & Moitra in Supreme Court

Bihar Election Commission challenge has been filed in the Supreme Court by politicians and NGOs. The People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Yogendra Yadav and Mohua Moitra have filed a writ petition with the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) directions to conduct Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in the State of Bihar.

Petitions filed by activist Yogendra Yadav, co – founder of Swaraj India and the Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mohua Moitra have also contested the Election Commission’s directions by citing violations of the constitution in the Supreme Court and the Representation of People’s Act, 1950. A plea by the NGO Association for Democratic Reforms has also moved a petition raising concerns over the ECI’s steps that can “disenfranchise” lakhs of voters.  

The directions issued by the ECI on 24 June 2025 are intended to maintain the integrity of the Electoral Roll (ER) by revising the list as per the guidelines of the Commission. Voters whose names do not figure in the 2003 ERs will have to submit proofs attesting their citizenship. 

A Special Summary Revision, an exercise of similar kind was carried out in Bihar six months ago which involved adding, removing and modifying names in the ER. The digitalization of the ER post 2003 elections had rendered the exercise ineffective. The move to revive the procedure has attracted hue and cry from politicians and activists that have been calling this a subtle sneaking in of the National Registers of Citizens (NRC), currently operative in Assam to address the issue of illegal immigrants arriving from Bangladesh and neighbouring countries.

 The PUCL, a voluntary human rights organisation is notable for its litigation in strengthening voter participation and democracy. In a writ petition filed by it, the Supreme Court held that elections are free and fair choices by voters between possible candidates to fill a seat. Persons who choose to vote NOTA do not attract legal consequences and must be protected in the same manner a person who chooses to vote for a political party is. 

Bihar is reported to be facing large – scale illegal immigration among states in the North East. The Election Commission has a legal mandate to revise the electoral roll through intensive summary revisions that is necessary to uphold transparency. The opposition’s concerns rests largely on suspected ulterior political motives in light of upcoming Bihar legislative assembly elections and the potential disenfranchisement of lakhs. 

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Redefining Worker Welfare: Social Security & Labour Reforms in India

Introduction

Redefining worker welfare has become a pressing need in India’s evolving labour landscape. Labour legislation forms the foundation of workforce governance, regulating the rights, responsibilities, and relationships between workers and employers. These laws ensure minimum standards for employment, workplace safety, wages, and dispute resolution. A key pillar of this system is social security, which offers financial and healthcare protection to workers and their families during periods of unemployment, injury, maternity, or old age.

India has a long history of labour legislation, dating back to colonial times. Post-independence, labour became a subject under the concurrent list of the Constitution, allowing both the Centre and States to legislate. Over time, this resulted in a complex web of over 40 central laws. In recent years, the government has consolidated these into four major codes, one of which is the Code on Social Security, 2020.

Understanding Social Security in India

Social security is defined by the International Labour Organization as protection provided by society to ensure access to health care and income security, particularly during critical life events. In India, social security is both a constitutional directive and a legislative commitment.

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, India’s first Labour Minister, played a foundational role in enacting early social security laws such as the Employees’ State Insurance Act (1948) and the Employees’ Provident Fund Act (1952). These laws were created to support the industrial workforce, ensuring financial protection for workers and their dependents.

Key Social Security Laws Pre-2020

Prior to the introduction of the Code on Social Security, several laws governed social benefits for workers:

  1. Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 – Provided compensation to workers injured or disabled during employment.
  2. Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 – Covered medical, maternity, and disability benefits.
  3. Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 – Ensured paid maternity leave and benefits to women workers.
  4. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Offered terminal benefits after five years of continuous service.
  5. Employees’ Provident Fund Act, 1952 – Created a retirement savings system for workers through employer-employee contributions.

Each law had its own procedures, definitions, and applicability, which made compliance difficult and often excluded informal workers.

The Social Security Code, 2020

To simplify and modernize the system, the Code on Social Security, 2020 consolidated nine existing laws. Its goals include expanding coverage, improving compliance, and enabling universal access to social security, particularly for gig workers, platform workers, and those in the unorganised sector.

Key Highlights:

  1. Wider Definitions: Terms like ‘employee’, ‘gig worker’, and ‘platform worker’ have been broadened to include a larger workforce. This brings workers on digital platforms like ride-sharing and food delivery under legal protection.
  2. Uniform Gratuity Provisions: Fixed-term employees are now eligible for gratuity after just one year of service.
  3. Maternity Benefits: The Code reinforces existing maternity laws and recognises biological, adoptive, and commissioning mothers.
  4. Centralised Welfare Boards: New boards and authorities will administer benefits and ensure compliance.
  5. Digitalisation: The government aims to use digital labour identification numbers and Aadhaar-linked databases to streamline benefits and track eligibility.
  6. Penalties and Enforcement: The Code includes stricter penalties for non-compliance, empowering inspector-cum-facilitators to monitor and guide establishments.

Challenges Ahead

Despite its progressive intent, the Code is yet to be implemented. There are practical challenges:

  1. Data Gaps: Registering and tracking gig and informal workers remains a logistical hurdle.
  2. Digital Divide: Many workers lack digital literacy or access, limiting their ability to register or claim benefits.
  3. Awareness and Accessibility: Workers and small employers often lack knowledge about their rights and obligations under the new Code.
  4. Funding and Infrastructure: Without adequate budget allocation and administrative infrastructure, the system may fall short of delivering intended benefits.

Moreover, the onus of implementation has largely shifted to employers, with limited institutional support for workers, particularly in the unorganised sector. While the Code proposes a framework, much depends on its execution, coordination between central and state governments, and sustained efforts to build awareness among stakeholders.

Conclusion

India’s shift toward consolidating labour laws through the Social Security Code, 2020 marks an important step in modernising labour welfare. By including previously excluded segments like gig and platform workers, the law aims to reflect the realities of a changing workforce. However, until the law is brought into force and backed by strong implementation mechanisms, its impact will remain on paper.

Effective enforcement, robust digital infrastructure, and continuous awareness campaigns are key to ensuring that social security becomes a right accessible to all Indian workers, not just a promise in legislation.

REFERENCES:

STATUTES

  1. The Workmen’s Compensation Act 1923
  2. The Employee’s State Insurance Act 1948
  3. The Maternity Benefit Act 1961
  4. The Payment of Gratuity Act 1972
  5. The Employee’s Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952

BOOKS

  1. Mishra S.N., Labour and Industrial Laws (29th edn. Central Law Publications, 2021)
  2. Srivastava C Suresh, Industrial Relations and Labour Laws (8th edn. Vikas Publishing House Private Ltd., 2021)
  3. Singh Avatar., Introduction to Labour and Industrial Laws (4th edn. Lexis Nexis, 2016)

ONLINE ARTICLES

  1. Arora Ishita, “Social Security of Labour Laws in India”, (2023) < Social Security of Labour in India by Ishita Arora:: SSRN > accessed 10 January 2024
  2. S Saranaya, V Pradeeksha, “Labour Laws and Social Security in India”, (2023) < 10163.pdf (ijfmr.com)> accessed 10 January 2024

Akshata Patole ( University of Mumbai – 4th year )

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)