Enforcement Litigation Associate Job at Saikrishna & Associates

Enforcement Litigation is a dynamic and high-impact area of legal practice, offering young professionals the opportunity to build strong litigation skills from the ground up. Saikrishna & Associates is one of India’s leading full-service law firms, specializing in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Media & Entertainment, Telecommunications, Technology, and Litigation. With a reputation for excellence and a diverse client base, the firm is known for its rigorous legal practices and comprehensive client support.

Located in Noida, the firm offers a dynamic working environment with opportunities to work on high-stakes cases, collaborate with experienced litigators, and develop a strong foundation in enforcement litigation.

Job Role: Associate – Enforcement Litigation Team

Saikrishna & Associates is currently hiring Associates to join its Enforcement Litigation Team in Noida. This is an excellent opportunity for law graduates or young professionals with 0–1 year of Post Qualification Experience (PQE) who are looking to build their careers in litigation.

Before being placed in the Associate role, candidates will undergo a compulsory two-month assessment internship, which serves as a pre-placement evaluation period.

Why Choose Enforcement Litigation?

Enforcement Litigation is a high-impact area of law that deals with executing legal rights through court action. This often includes cases related to:

  • Intellectual Property rights enforcement
  • Anti-piracy actions
  • Injunctions and seizure matters
  • Criminal enforcement under various IP laws
  • Technology and digital rights enforcement

Working in this team offers real-time courtroom exposure and hands-on experience in strategizing and executing enforcement actions—making it ideal for anyone who thrives in a fast-paced legal environment.

Who Can Apply?

  • Fresh law graduates from recognized universities
  • Candidates with up to 1 year of PQE in litigation or intellectual property
  • Individuals with strong legal research, drafting, and analytical skills
  • Applicants who are highly motivated, team-oriented, and passionate about litigation and IP enforcement

This role is best suited for individuals who wish to gain deep insights into litigation strategy, case preparation, and court procedures.

Key Highlights of the Role

  • Location: Noida, Uttar Pradesh
  • Position: Associate – Enforcement Litigation Team
  • PQE Required: 0–1 year
  • Pre-requisite: 2-month assessment internship (compulsory before placement)
  • Mode: Full-time, in-office

How to Apply

Interested candidates must send their updated CV to:
hr@saikrishnaassociates.com

Make sure to mention “Enforcement Litigation” in the subject line of your email. Applications without this subject line may be missed or overlooked.

What to Expect During the Assessment Internship?

The two-month assessment internship is designed to evaluate your core competencies and suitability for the Enforcement Litigation team. During this period, you will:

  • Assist in ongoing litigation cases
  • Conduct detailed legal research
  • Draft pleadings, notices, and enforcement documents
  • Observe court proceedings
  • Learn from experienced lawyers and gain client exposure

Performance during the internship will be a key factor in your selection for the Associate role.

Skills That Will Help You Stand Out

  • Knowledge of Civil and Criminal Procedure Codes
  • Familiarity with Intellectual Property Law (especially copyright and trademark)
  • Legal drafting and research skills
  • Communication and teamwork
  • Ability to work under pressure and meet deadlines

If you have a keen interest in courtroom advocacy and IP protection, this role can be the perfect platform for launching your litigation career.

Why Work With Saikrishna & Associates?

  • Work with some of the top legal minds in the field
  • Exposure to high-profile clients and litigation cases
  • Structured learning through mentorship and training
  • Strong career growth prospects
  • Culture of performance, discipline, and ethical legal practice

Conclusion

The Enforcement Litigation Associate position at Saikrishna & Associates is a golden opportunity for law graduates and freshers eager to begin their career in high-stakes litigation. With structured mentorship, challenging casework, and a team of leading legal experts, this role provides not just employment but a solid foundation for future legal success.

If you’re passionate about litigation and eager to gain hands-on experience in a fast-paced legal environment, this role offers the ideal platform to grow. With direct exposure to courtroom proceedings, mentorship from top litigators, and a chance to work on real enforcement matters, you’ll be taking a confident step toward a meaningful and rewarding legal career.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Section 92 CPC maintainable for Societies: Operation Asha v. Shelly Batra

Section 92 of the CPC is maintainable and applies to public trusts and constructive trusts. In Operation Asha vs. Shelly Batra, a non-profit society that works for disadvantaged communities, the Apex Court found that the Doctrine of Constructive Trust applies even if societies are registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 as long as some fiduciary criteria are met.

The aim and objective of Operation Asha is of public and charitable nature. All the incomes, earnings, properties and MoAs are to be solely dedicated to promote the society’s aims. Furthermore, the strict “non-profit” rule of the society determines the society to have a credible fiduciary relationship in this scenario. 

A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan reaffirmed the English principle of constructive trusts for application in Indian courts too. The codification of the constructive trust principles was to limit judicial discretion but it does not mean that the doctrine has been removed from Indian law. The 2019 judgment in Janardan Dagdu Khomane and Another v. Eknath Bhiku Yadav & Ors. had elaborated upon this concept. 

The repeal of Section 94 of the Trusts Act, 1882 by Benami Transactions Prohibition Act, 1988 does not prevent the Court from declaring a trust outside the scope of this Act. In Sugra Bibi v. Hazi Kummu Mia (1968), the Court stressed on the dominant purpose of the plaint which must be in furtherance of public interest. Section 92 suits need to be motivated from representative capacity to vindicate public rights and not merely individual interests. 

The serious allegations of mismanagement and financial misconduct affecting the public interest may be pursued under Section 92 because it is a special provision. However, personal grievances need to be addressed separately. Even if certain private rights are agitated, it does not take away the importance of the other allegations.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)