6-Month Remote Corporate Law Internship at Straive for Students

Remote Corporate Law Internship opportunities are a golden gateway for law students to gain real-world exposure to in-house legal functions — and Straive is now offering exactly that. With a strong industry reputation and innovation-driven culture, Straive invites applications for its 6-month remote internship program. This internship is ideal for law students who want to dive deep into corporate legal operations such as contract review, regulatory compliance, legal documentation, and policy research — all while pursuing their academics.

About Straive

Straive is a leading global provider of data services, helping organizations leverage the full Data → Insights → Knowledge → AI spectrum. It serves a wide range of industries including Financial Services, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Scientific Research, EdTech, and Logistics. Straive’s unique blend of technology and human expertise allows it to solve industry-specific problems by transforming data into enterprise-level, actionable knowledge.

By embedding specific knowledge into AI-driven digital technology — and involving skilled professionals as part of the solution — Straive ensures efficiency, adaptability, and compliance in business functions, including legal operations.

Why Choose This Internship?

This Remote Corporate Law Internship at Straive provides more than just virtual work — it offers a structured and in-depth learning experience in corporate law. You will gain:

  • Practical skills in reviewing contracts, understanding regulatory frameworks, and writing legal documentation.
  • Exposure to real-world challenges faced by corporate legal teams in a multinational company.
  • Mentorship from experienced legal professionals who can guide your legal thinking and research approach.
  • Flexibility to work remotely while managing your studies — perfect for law students in 3-year or 5-year programs.

Role and Responsibilities

As a legal intern, you will work under the guidance of Straive’s legal team and assist in:

  • Reviewing and interpreting corporate contracts, NDAs, and other legal documents
  • Conducting legal research on various topics including corporate governance, data compliance, and contract law
  • Assisting in preparing internal legal documentation, policies, and compliance checklists
  • Maintaining digital legal files and assisting with document lifecycle management
  • Supporting day-to-day legal queries and helping ensure regulatory compliance

This internship will sharpen your drafting, analytical, and research skills — giving you a well-rounded understanding of in-house legal work.

Who Can Apply?

This remote corporate law internship is best suited for law students who meet the following criteria:

  • Strong command over written and spoken English
  • Legal research and drafting skills
  • Basic working knowledge of MS Office or Google Workspace
  • Interest in corporate law, contracts, compliance, and in-house counsel functions
  • Detail-oriented, proactive, and self-driven
  • Enrolled in a recognized law school (3-year or 5-year program)

Whether you’re in the 2nd, 3rd, or final year of your law program, this internship offers career-relevant experience.

Internship Details

  • Duration: 6 Months
  • Mode: Remote (Work-from-Home)

This format allows for sustained engagement with ongoing legal tasks and contributes to meaningful learning over time.

Benefits of the Internship

  • Certificate of Internship from Straive
  • Practical experience with one of the leading data and analytics companies
  • Mentorship and feedback from professionals in the corporate legal field
  • Legal exposure that strengthens your resume and job readiness
  • Flexible schedule that supports your law school commitments

Application Process

Interested candidates should email their CV to:
shobika.subramanian@straive.com

Subject Line: Application for Remote Corporate Law Internship – [Your Name]

Optional: Include a brief cover letter in the email body explaining your motivation, career interests, and availability.

Final Words

This Remote Corporate Law Internship at Straive is an excellent opportunity for law students to get ahead in their legal career. It combines the convenience of remote learning with the depth of a structured legal experience — tailored for those who want to specialize in corporate and in-house legal functions.

Apply today, and start your journey into the corporate legal world with Straive — where data, compliance, and law meet innovation.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Delhi High Court: Anti-CAA protestors bail applications rejected

A Division Bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur at the Delhi High Court have observed on 2 September, 2025 that the February 2020 protest led by a faction of Anti-CAA protestors, that bail applications with regards to Sharjeel Imam and Umer Khalid amongst others, have stood disposed of. The Court has found the protest to have been a “premeditated, well-orchestrated conspiracy to commit unlawful activities threatening the unity, integrity, and sovereignty of India” that cannot be read as res integra to existing judicial interpretation while deciding the grant or refusal of bail to an accused booked for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

The Court has found that the prosecution’s case rests on an alleged deep-rooted conspiracy by the accused to orchestrate large-scale riots in Delhi in protest against the enactment of the CAA and NRC. The conspiracy is stated to have been initiated through the creation of WhatsApp groups and coordination among student bodies and individuals, with the object of organizing round-the-clock sit-in protests across Delhi. The prosecution asserts that these activities involved the development of protest sites, circulation of incite-ful pamphlets, delivery of inflammatory speeches, and propagation of misleading narratives to mobilize the Muslim community, which in turn led to incidents of violence at JMI, Shaheen Bagh, and North-East Delhi. It is further alleged that conspiratorial meetings were held to plan the escalation of protests into riots, with weapons such as firearms, petrol bombs, acid, rods, and stones being stockpiled, alongside measures like dislocating CCTVs and organizing chakka-jaams to disrupt essential supplies. The culmination of these acts is alleged to be the communal riots of February 2020, which resulted in 54 deaths, including a senior police officer and an IB official, grievous injuries to several police personnel and civilians, destruction of over 1,500 public and private properties, and severe damage to communal harmony in the national capital.

The two primary accused “masterminds”, Imam and Khalid were arrested on 20 August 2020. Clashes broke out between anti-CAA and pro-CAA protestors on 23 February 2020. The mob violence picked up pace and led to severe rioting and tense circumstances that resulted in the death of over 54 persons and damage to thousands of public properties, attacks on journalists by pro-CAA protestors. ThePrint journalists uncovered a rare show of interfaith Hindu-Muslim solidarity during this time. 

Delhi High Court clarified, however, that the present observations are confined to the consideration of bail and shall not affect the merits of the case, which remain subject to cross-examination and trial. Consequently, the bail appeals were dismissed.

The appeals by Athar Khan, Shadab Ahmad and Saleem Khan were not considered by the Court. Allegations suggest their presence in various meetings and especially on the intervening night of 23 February 2020 were alleged discussions to further violence against Policemen and non-Muslims. Similarly, the appeals by Shifa-ur-Rehman and Meeran Haider. The appellants have said that the claims are general and unsubstantiated, resting largely on their passive attendance at meetings, inclusion in WhatsApp groups, or association with legitimate student and alumni bodies, without any specific evidence demonstrating intent, preparation, or involvement in a terrorist act or conspiracy. In dismissing their appeals, the Court mentioned mere completion of investigation would not be a material change in the circumstance to grant bail considering the seriousness of allegations levelled.

In rejecting the plea by Gulfisha Fatima, the Court stressed that comparisons cannot be made to co-accused released on bail since the role ascribed to the appellants on record is vastly different. By reasoning that the preservation of the broader legislative intent and striking a balance on individual liberty and rule of law, has necessitated the rejection of applications.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)