Corporate Law Internship at KNG TechLaw Partners – Remote/Hybrid | Apply Now

Corporate Law Internship at KNG TechLaw Partners offers an exciting opportunity to gain practical exposure to corporate legal matters, contract drafting, compliance advisory, and more. Open to all law students, this internship is available in remote or hybrid mode, providing both flexibility and professional learning.

KNG TechLaw Partners is a reputed law firm known for its specialized focus on corporate law, data privacy, commercial transactions, and legal compliance. The internship aims to develop the legal and analytical skills necessary for a career in corporate legal practice, making it an excellent opportunity for aspiring corporate lawyers.

About the Firm: KNG TechLaw Partners

KNG TechLaw Partners is a progressive legal advisory firm that works at the intersection of law, technology, and business. The firm focuses on Corporate Law, Data Privacy, Intellectual Property, Compliance Management, and Commercial Transactions. With a team of experienced professionals and a growing portfolio of clients, the firm provides interns with real-world legal challenges and opportunities to learn from industry experts.

The firm’s working culture encourages learning, collaboration, and initiative, making it a valuable space for legal interns to sharpen their skills and gain mentorship.

Internship Details

Here are the key details for the Corporate Law Internship at KNG TechLaw Partners:

  • Practice Area: Corporate Law
  • Mode: Remote / Hybrid
  • Duration: 1 to 3 Months
  • Eligibility: Law students from 3-year or 5-year programs
  • Remuneration: Retainership fee as per market standards

Whether you are seeking a short-term internship or a slightly extended experience, the duration offers flexibility to accommodate academic calendars.

Internship Responsibilities

Interns will get hands-on exposure to various aspects of corporate legal practice, including:

  • Contract drafting and review
  • Legal research on company law and commercial laws
  • Advisory on corporate governance and compliance issues
  • Understanding regulatory frameworks and commercial negotiations
  • Assisting with documentation related to mergers, partnerships, or transactions

These responsibilities ensure that interns build a practical understanding of how legal frameworks operate in real business scenarios.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of the internship, students will gain:

  • Practical skills in drafting and reviewing contracts
  • Knowledge of corporate compliance and regulatory procedures
  • Insight into commercial transactions and deal-making
  • Improved legal research and client advisory abilities
  • Experience in working with senior corporate legal professionals

The internship offers the perfect balance of theoretical understanding and application of corporate laws.

Why Join KNG TechLaw Partners?

  • Mentorship from experts in corporate, data privacy, and technology law
  • Opportunity to work on live client matters and legal advisory projects
  • Flexible work mode allowing remote or hybrid working
  • Exposure to the intersection of law, technology, and commerce
  • Enhance your legal writing, compliance management, and risk analysis skills

KNG TechLaw Partners also focuses on grooming interns to become future-ready professionals equipped to work in both legal firms and in-house corporate legal teams.

Application Process

Interested candidates must follow these steps to apply:

  1. Prepare an updated CV
  2. Draft a concise cover letter highlighting relevant experience or interest in corporate law
  3. Send your application to: Saumyagupta@kngtechlaw.com

Make sure your subject line clearly states:
“Application for Corporate Law Internship – [Your Name]”

Applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis, so early submission is advised.

Final Words

The Corporate Law Internship at KNG TechLaw Partners is a valuable opportunity for law students who aspire to build a career in corporate legal advisory, transactional work, or compliance. With a flexible mode of work, live project exposure, and mentorship from experts, this internship will not only build your resume but also prepare you for the dynamic demands of modern corporate law practice.

If you’re serious about gaining relevant legal experience in the corporate field, don’t miss this opportunity. Apply today and take the next step toward a rewarding legal career.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

SC upholds legality of Justice Yashwant Varma in-house procedure

A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih on 7 August 2025 have upheld the constitutionality of the in-house procedure in the Justice Yashwant Varma as having legality under Article 141 of the Constitution and Section 3(2) of the Judges (Protection) Act. A fire breakout at the bungalow of the petitioner Allahabad HC judge resulted in the detection of burned currency notes, which entailed a confidential investigation under the Supreme Court’s “In-house Procedure.”

The petitioner had challenged the procedural fairness of the investigation after the committee, having found substance in the allegations, recommended further action by an inquiry report. Mr. Kapil Sibal appearing for the petitioner called it a violation of Articles 14 and 21, considering the public release of the incriminating photograph/video footage. 

The Court referred to the precedent in the C. Ravichandran Iyer case and reaffirmed that the evolution of the law post the judgement has consistently upheld the in-house mechanism of discipline as self-regulation by this Court. The ruling in the Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability cannot be read as limitation on the powers and responsibilities of the Chief Justice of India, especially in matters concerning internal judicial discipline and preservation of institutional integrity. The bench recognized that there is a constitutional silence on internal mechanisms but that does not prohibit judicial innovation that has stood the test of time. 

Questioning why the petitioner delayed from objecting to the publication of the photographs of video footage, the Court also mentioned that the same is not a procedural requirement nor is it proper. Though it does not give rise to any benefits to the petitioner at this stage. The Petitioner should not have waited for completion of the fact- finding inquiry set in motion by the CJI before challenging the footage. 

Section 3(1) of the Judges (Protection) Act, while Section 3(1) grants judges immunity from civil or criminal proceedings for acts done in the discharge of judicial functions. This immunity is subject to proceedings initiated by the Central Government, State Government, the Supreme Court, any High Court, or any other legally empowered authority under “any law for the time being in force.” as per Section 3(2) of the Act. The procedure stems from the scope of power defined in Article 141 of the Constitution. The in-house inquiry is itself not a removal mechanism but a preliminary fact-finding process, and the Parliament continues to have the intact and unfettered constitutional power for removal of a judge.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)