Mediatrium Commercial Negotiation Competition 2025 – Register Now

The Mediatrium Commercial Negotiation Competition 2025 is more than just an event—it’s a dynamic global platform designed to empower students with practical negotiation and dispute resolution skills that are increasingly vital in today’s fast-paced legal and business environments.

Hosted entirely online, this flagship initiative by Mediatrium is open to undergraduate university students across the world. If you’re passionate about strategy, communication, and law, this competition offers a unique opportunity to sharpen your skills under the mentorship of top experts and compete in challenging, real-life-inspired negotiation scenarios.

Why Mediatrium?

Mediatrium is an emerging force in the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) space in India, committed to bridging the gap between academic theory and practical legal applications. It was founded to promote a culture of dialogue and consensus while empowering the next generation of legal professionals. Mediatrium’s initiatives include workshops, training programs, and competitions that create immersive learning experiences.

Through this competition, Mediatrium aims to advance India’s position as a hub for ADR innovation and experiential legal education.

What Makes the Competition Unique?

The Mediatrium Commercial Negotiation Competition 2025 places students directly in the role of commercial negotiators. Participants tackle complex business disputes in high-pressure scenarios, testing their abilities in strategic thinking, persuasion, teamwork, and cultural adaptability.

Some standout features include:

  • Realistic Negotiation Scenarios based on commercial challenges.
  • Global Participation, allowing for diverse styles and cross-cultural learning.
  • International Panel of Judges, including experts from law, business, and dispute resolution sectors.
  • Holistic Feedback provided to help students grow beyond the competition setting.

Competition Format

The structure is both rigorous and rewarding:

  1. Negotiation Plan Qualifier Round: All registered teams submit a detailed written plan. This round evaluates strategic clarity and vision.
  2. Preliminary Rounds: Selected teams participate in two rounds, switching roles as requesting and responding parties.
  3. Knockout Stage: Top 8 teams advance to the Quarterfinals, followed by Semifinals and Finals, judged by a global panel of ADR professionals.

The competition concludes with a high-level final negotiation and closing ceremony.

Important Details

  • Mode: Online
  • Team Size: 2 members per team
  • Eligibility: Undergraduate university students
  • Initial Registration Fee: ₹2,500
  • Additional Fee (upon qualification): ₹2,000
  • Registration Link: Register here

Timeline to Remember (2025)

  • May 12: Provisional registrations open
  • May 28: Last date for provisional registration
  • May 29: Final registration begins
  • June 8: Final registration closes
  • June 15: Release of negotiation plan brief
  • June 22: Deadline for plan submission
  • June 25: Results of qualifier round
  • July 5–6: Preliminary and Knockout rounds + Closing ceremony

For full timeline details, refer to the official brochure or reach out to the organizers.

Awards and Recognition

The competition offers a range of awards including:

  • Winning Team: ₹15,000 + Certificate
  • Runners-Up: ₹10,000 + Certificate
  • Best Negotiation Plan: ₹6,000 + Certificate
  • Best Preliminary Round Team: ₹6,000 + Certificate
  • Merit Certificates: For Best Opening Statement, Teamwork, and Creative Solutions

How to Apply

Teams must complete the registration form via this link. Ensure both members are undergraduate students and ready to commit to the schedule outlined above.

Final Thoughts

The Mediatrium Commercial Negotiation Competition 2025 is a one-of-a-kind opportunity for students looking to explore international dispute resolution, commercial negotiation, and policy-level strategy work. With expert guidance, global exposure, and real-world simulation, this competition equips you not just to win awards—but to thrive in any professional negotiation setting you may face in the future.

Whether you aim to pursue a career in law, diplomacy, business, or any field that demands persuasive communication and strategic thinking, this competition is your stepping stone to mastering the art of negotiation. It offers not only a platform to test your skills but also an immersive environment where you learn to think critically, collaborate under pressure, and engage in high-level discourse.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Coal India Ltd., competent to fix coal prices for the non-core sector: Coal India Ltd vs M/S Rahul Industries . And Ors

In the matter of Coal Ltd vs M/S Rahul Industries and Ors.. the Supreme Court on 12 September 2025 upheld the validity of the Interim Coal Policy notified on 15 December 2006, holding that Coal India Ltd., a public sector undertaking, was competent to fix coal prices for the non-core sector under the deregulated framework of the Colliery Control Order, 2000.

A bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan dealt with the issue of smokeless fuel against a 20% price hike introduced under the Interim Coal Policy, the same being linked to non-core sectors against consumers in the core sector. The Court clarified that Ashoka Smokeless judgement struck down the e-auction system for lacking a viable pricing mechanism but did not reinstate prior price levels or prohibit interim pricing.

The issues lying before the Court comprised of firstly, whether Coal India Limited (CIL) had the legal authority to notify interim coal prices following the Supreme Court’s decision in Ashoka Smokeless. Secondly, whether the 20% price increase imposed on the non-core sector consumers was arbitrary, discriminatory, and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, particularly considering the differential treatment between core and non-core sectors. Thirdly, the question was whether the respondents were entitled to claim refunds for the alleged excess amount paid during the period when the Interim Coal Policy was in effect.

The Court found that from the above legal exposition, it is clear that if there is a concern that the party claiming a refund may have shifted the financial burden or loss to a third party, then a refund should not be allowed. In such situations, the State bears the responsibility to retain those funds and apply them for the benefit of the public, acting in its capacity as parens patriae (guardian of the public interest). The argument of the same being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution was rejected. 

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)