Law Drishti Logo
Law Drishti Logo
Contact
Submit Posts

CNLU National Mediation Competition 2025

Deadline : 8 Jan

The Chanakya Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution (CCADR) at Chanakya National Law University (CNLU), Patna, proudly announces the Third Edition of the CNLU National Mediation Competition 2025. Following the success of previous editions, this prestigious event continues to inspire innovation and excellence in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), fostering a robust mediation culture among law students across the nation.

Event Format and Key Dates

This year’s competition will feature a hybrid format, blending the convenience of virtual engagement with the dynamism of in-person rounds:

  • Virtual Rounds (Prelims & Quarterfinals): January 24-25, 2025
  • Offline Rounds (Semifinals & Finals): February 16, 2025, hosted on CNLU’s Patna campus.

Participants will navigate through meticulously designed mediation simulations judged by renowned practitioners, academics, and mediators, offering unmatched practical exposure to ADR processes.

Registration and Eligibility

Open to law students enrolled in LLB programs at Bar Council of India-recognized institutions, the competition mandates teams of three: a mediator and a client-counsel pair. With only 24 team slots available, registration is highly competitive. Don’t miss the deadline—January 8, 2025!

Awards and Opportunities

The competition boasts an impressive prize pool, including ₹63,000 in cash awards, trophies, and exclusive internships with ADR-focused organizations. Top mediators and negotiating teams will also earn certificates and accolades that set them apart in their legal careers.

What’s in it for Participants?

More than a contest, the CNLU National Mediation Competition 2025 is an immersive learning journey. Here’s why you should join:

  • Skill Development: Sharpen your negotiation, problem-solving, and mediation expertise.
  • Professional Networking: Build connections with ADR experts and like-minded peers from across India.
  • Mentorship Opportunities: Gain insights from leading ADR professionals during the competition.

How to Get Involved

For detailed guidelines, key dates, and updates, visit the CCADR website. Got questions? Reach out to the organizing committee for assistance.

Be part of a transformative journey in dispute resolution. Join the CNLU National Mediation Competition 2025 and contribute to creating a legacy of harmony and dialogue!

Rulebook NMC 3.0Download
  • 20 Shares

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article
Law Drishti »Legal Stories » Section 92 CPC maintainable for Societies: Operation Asha v. Shelly Batra

Section 92 CPC maintainable for Societies: Operation Asha v. Shelly Batra

Quick Apply

Section 92 of the CPC is maintainable and applies to public trusts and constructive trusts. In Operation Asha vs. Shelly Batra, a non-profit society that works for disadvantaged communities, the Apex Court found that the Doctrine of Constructive Trust applies even if societies are registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 as long as some fiduciary criteria are met.

The aim and objective of Operation Asha is of public and charitable nature. All the incomes, earnings, properties and MoAs are to be solely dedicated to promote the society’s aims. Furthermore, the strict “non-profit” rule of the society determines the society to have a credible fiduciary relationship in this scenario. 

A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan reaffirmed the English principle of constructive trusts for application in Indian courts too. The codification of the constructive trust principles was to limit judicial discretion but it does not mean that the doctrine has been removed from Indian law. The 2019 judgment in Janardan Dagdu Khomane and Another v. Eknath Bhiku Yadav & Ors. had elaborated upon this concept. 

The repeal of Section 94 of the Trusts Act, 1882 by Benami Transactions Prohibition Act, 1988 does not prevent the Court from declaring a trust outside the scope of this Act. In Sugra Bibi v. Hazi Kummu Mia (1968), the Court stressed on the dominant purpose of the plaint which must be in furtherance of public interest. Section 92 suits need to be motivated from representative capacity to vindicate public rights and not merely individual interests. 

The serious allegations of mismanagement and financial misconduct affecting the public interest may be pursued under Section 92 because it is a special provision. However, personal grievances need to be addressed separately. Even if certain private rights are agitated, it does not take away the importance of the other allegations.

  • 20 Shares

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join Now
Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

  • contact@lawdrishti.com
  • Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

  • advertise@lawdrishti.com
  • Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)
Contact us
For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)