6th ICFAI Inter University Moot Court Competition

Moot court competitions are more than academic exercises—they are transformative experiences that shape the next generation of legal professionals. These events bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, equipping students with essential skills for their careers.

The 6th ICFAI Inter University Moot Court Competition, 2025

The ICFAI Law School, Dehradun, is hosting the 6th ICFAI Inter University Moot Court Competition on February 15–16, 2025. This prestigious national-level competition invites law students from across India to tackle a challenging moot problem inspired by South Indiana’s legal framework. Participants will engage with critical constitutional issues like reservation policies and administrative powers, reflecting real-world legal challenges.

Why Moot Court Competitions Matter

  1. Skill Development: Mooting helps students master legal research, drafting memorials, and delivering persuasive arguments.
  2. Teamwork: Teams collaborate to analyze case laws, structure arguments, and refine courtroom presentations.
  3. Critical Thinking: Participants learn to respond to questions and challenges on their feet, mimicking real courtroom dynamics.

Awards and Recognition

The competition acknowledges excellence with awards for categories like:

  • WINNER – Cash Prize of Rs. 21,000/- + Merit Certificate + Trophy
  • RUNNER-UP – Cash Prize of Rs. 11,000/- + Merit Certificate + Trophy
  • BEST SPEAKER – Cash Prize of Rs. 2,100/- + Merit Certificate + Trophy
  • BEST RESEARCHER – Cash Prize of Rs. 2,100/- + Merit Certificate + Trophy

These accolades not only boost participants’ confidence but also enhance their professional profiles.

ICFAI Law School’s Commitment

ICFAI Law School, Dehradun, consistently ranks among India’s top law institutions. Its focus on holistic education combines academic rigor with practical exposure. By organizing moot court competitions, it empowers students to develop analytical, advocacy, and leadership skills essential for the legal profession.

The 6th ICFAI Moot Court Competition is more than a contest—it’s an opportunity to experience the complexities of law, learn from peers, and prepare for a successful legal career. Aspiring lawyers will leave the event better equipped to contribute meaningfully to India’s legal system.

Procedure

Each participating team shall fill out the registration form from- here by 5th February, 2025 23:59 IST for registering in the competition.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Supreme Court reaffirms the Panchsheel Test for circumstantial evidence

The Supreme Court has reaffirmed the Panchsheel Test for establishing circumstantial evidence in Shail Kumari vs The State Of Chhattisgarh delivered on 6 August 2025. A bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and K. Vinod Chandran allowed the present appeal and found the Trial Court’s decision based on conjectures and surmises.

The appellant was alleged to have drowned her two children as per circumstantial evidence. The Court referred to the ratio in Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra wherein the five tests for proof of circumstantial evidence was put forward: (1) the accused must be proven guilty and not on conjectures, (2) established facts must be consistent with guilt of the accused, (3) the evidence needs to be of conclusive nature, (4) all other possible hypothesis needs to be removed from speculation and lastly, (5) the chain of evidence must not carry reasonable doubts. 

This is a precedence in appellate reversal of lifetime imprisonment conviction on account of insufficient evidence. The bench found no link between the appellant and the crime in question and the testimony to be highly unreliable and hearsay evidence. The three kinds of witness classification in the case of Vadivelu Thevar was referred to:(i) wholly reliable, (ii) wholly unreliable, and (iii) neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable. 

The law laid down in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda requires the prosecution to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt to demonstrate a chain of circumstances that is so inextricably connected to exclude all other possible deviations from the truth alleged. The Court found no such connections in the present appeal. Therefore, the impugned judgement by the Trial Court dated 18th June 2004 was quashed and set aside.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM – 9 PM (Mon-Sat)