4th MNLU Nagpur National Technology Law Moot (NTLM) 2025

โšช๏ธ Early data ยท 0
Too early to tell 0 reports
โš–๏ธ Know if this firm actually replies before applying

Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur (MNLU Nagpur), is hosting the 4th National Technology Law Moot (NTLM) 2025 from March 28-30, 2025, Technology and law are increasingly intertwined, raising complex legal challenges that demand innovative solutions. To nurture the next generation of legal professionals adept at navigating these challenges.

About NTLM 2025

NTLM stands out as a premier moot court competition dedicated solely to Technology Law, providing a platform for law students to analyze and debate pressing issues related to digital governance, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and innovation policy.

Organized by the Moot Court Committee (MCC) of MNLU Nagpur, the competition is structured in two stages:

  • Memorial Qualification Round, where teams submit written arguments.
  • Oral Rounds, where the top 20 qualifying teams present their cases before a distinguished panel of legal experts, scholars, and industry professionals at the university campus.

Why Join NTLM 2025 ?

Exciting Rewards: Winners receive cash prizes, trophies, and certificates for their outstanding performances.

Enhance Advocacy Skills: Develop expertise in legal research, argumentation, and drafting.

Gain Expert Insights: Interact with leading legal minds and professionals in the field of technology law.

Compete at a National Level: Engage with law students from across India in a highly competitive environment.

Event Details:

Venue: Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur
Dates: March 28โ€“30, 2025

Click here for Brochure & other relevant document

Eligibility:

The competition is open to students who are currently pursuing LL.B. degree programs (3-year or 5-year courses) at any institution accredited by the Bar Council of India. Each team must comprise 2 to 3 members, and each university is permitted to provisionally register up to two (2) teams.

Registration Fee:

Teams participating in the competition must complete the payment process in two stages:

  • Stage I: A registration fee of INR 3,500/- (excluding GST) must be paid for the Memorial Evaluation Round.
  • Stage II: Teams that qualify in Stage I are required to pay INR 4,500/- (excluding GST). This fee covers both accommodation and registration for the oral rounds of the competition.

click here for Registration

click here for payment link

Important Dates:

February 5, 2025 โ€“ Release of Brochure & Opening of Provisional Registration

February 12, 2025 โ€“ Release of Moot Proposition & Rulebook

February 20, 2025 โ€“ Deadline for Seeking Clarifications

February 24, 2025 โ€“ Deadline for Provisional Registration

February 26, 2025 โ€“ Release of Clarifications

February 28, 2025 โ€“ Deadline for Final Registration

March 11, 2025 โ€“ Deadline for Memorial Submission

March 16, 2025 โ€“ Release of Memorial Evaluation Rounds

March 28-30, 2025 โ€“ Researchersโ€™ Test & Oral Rounds

Awards & Prizes:

  • Winner โ€“ Cash Prize of INR 40,000/-, along with a Trophy and Certificate of Merit
  • Runners-Up โ€“ Cash Prize of INR 25,000/-, along with a Trophy and Certificate of Merit
  • Best Memorial โ€“ Cash Prize of INR 12,000/-, along with a Trophy and Certificate of Merit
  • Best Speaker โ€“ Cash Prize of INR 12,000/-, along with a Trophy and Certificate of Merit
  • Best Researcher โ€“ Cash Prize of INR 12,000/-, along with a Trophy and Certificate of Merit

Contact Information

For Queries, Contact:

  • Soham Kale (Convenor): +91 95298 94476
  • Atharva Giratkar: +91 79720 67454
  • Tarang Arora: +91 63962 25651

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Article

Nicaragua v United States Explained

Landmark ICJ Ruling: Nicaragua v. United States Explained

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered a pivotal ruling in the case of Nicaragua v United States on June 27, 1986. This decision significantly shaped international law regarding sovereignty and the use of force. In this case, Nicaragua alleged that the U.S. violated its sovereignty through covert military actions, including support for the Contra rebels and direct military interventions.

Key Facts of the Case

Initially, Nicaragua claimed that the U.S. engaged in a range of unlawful activities starting in 1981. Specifically, these included:

  • Support for the Contras: The U.S. allegedly recruited and armed this rebel group to undermine Nicaraguaโ€™s government.
  • Direct Military Actions: Moreover, the U.S. was accused of mining Nicaraguan ports and conducting aerial incursions.
  • Economic Sanctions: Additionally, Nicaragua argued that U.S. sanctions were designed to destabilize its economy.

Nicaragua contended that these actions violated key principles of international law, such as the prohibition on the use of force and the non-intervention principle, as outlined in the United Nations Charter.

Jurisdiction and Procedural History

In April 1984, Nicaragua filed its application with the ICJ, asserting that the Court had jurisdiction based on customary international law. Conversely, the U.S. contested this, arguing its actions were justified under the right to collective self-defense in response to Nicaraguaโ€™s support for insurgents in El Salvador. However, the ICJ affirmed its jurisdiction, emphasizing the applicability of customary law.

The Courtโ€™s Decision on Nicaragua v United States

Ultimately, the ICJ ruled in favor of Nicaragua, finding that the United States violated international law through its military and paramilitary activities. The Court’s key findings included:

  • Violation of Sovereignty: First and foremost, the U.S. breached Nicaragua’s sovereignty by supporting the Contras and conducting direct military actions.
  • Prohibition on Use of Force: Furthermore, the U.S. actions were deemed contrary to Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter.
  • Rejection of Self-Defense Claim: Finally, the Court determined that there was no sufficient evidence of an armed attack by Nicaragua that would warrant U.S. intervention.

Significance of the Ruling

This ruling is crucial for several reasons:

  • Affirmation of Customary International Law: It reinforced the importance of customary norms against the use of force and non-intervention, independent of treaty obligations.
  • Clarification of Self-Defense: The Court outlined strict criteria for legitimate self-defense, emphasizing necessity and proportionality.
  • Impact on Superpower Policies: Notably, the decision challenged interventionist policies of powerful states, asserting that international law applies universally.

Aftermath

Despite the ICJ’s order for the U.S. to cease its actions and provide reparations, the United States did not comply with the ruling. Nevertheless, this landmark case remains influential in discussions of state sovereignty, intervention, and the legal boundaries of self-defense.

In conclusion, the Nicaragua v. United States case serves as a vital reference point in international law. Ultimately, it demonstrates the ICJ’s role in upholding legal norms and principles in the face of state power.


Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Next Article

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

contact@lawdrishti.com

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

advertise@lawdrishti.com

Timing

Hours: 9 AM โ€“ 9 PM (Mon-Sat)

See the below animation to allow notifications.

Start getting Lawdrishti updates useful for you!

Contact Us

For Submitting a Post

For Banner ads & admission campaigns

Contact us
For Submitting a Post
For Banner ads & admission campaigns
Timing

Hours: 9 AM โ€“ 9 PM (Mon-Sat)